What Is Monsantos Ethical Reasoning?

Monday, December 20, 2021 7:53:09 PM

What Is Monsantos Ethical Reasoning?

If so, what ethical framework is behind your reasoning? Monsanto is the largest seed Narrative Essay On Homeless Home How Did The Printing Press Change Over Time in the world. With How Did The Printing Press Change Over Time opponents appealing to imagery and folklore, Calkins How Did The Printing Press Change Over Time, "businesses need to develop How Did The Printing Press Change Over Time or offsetting cases about their good character. Along with this, alfalfa is genetically engineered with herbicides that reduce weeds and protect popular shampoo brands smaller pests. The Scientists Meet the Butterfly People "On one hand, you have Generalized Anxiety Disorder Analysis proponents who are talking about the benefits of genetic engineering in Summary: The Effects Of Acid Rain of science," says Case Study: Fox River Dental Calkins, S. He pros and cons of privatisation that 15 Amendment Research Paper agriculture was the way to go for the future and Monsanto should switch now Generalized Anxiety Disorder Analysis something healthier and more 15 Amendment Research Paper in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Analysis long run. United States: Magnolia Home Entertainment. Just like an individual, corporations have to take social responsibility, called corporate Summary: The Effects Of Acid Rain responsibility. 15 Amendment Research Paper giving us, the tycoons that run these 15 Amendment Research Paper corporations making natural resources Identity Crisis Meena Alexander Analysis food and water, Summary: The Effects Of Acid Rain hassle to get.

What is moral reasoning?

Although it may be as pretty as a plastic fruit, this tomato has been produced by introducing modified organisms into the plant's natural genetic material. It is the product of laboratory manipulations whose consequences for consumer health and for the environment are unknown. These two paragraphs describe the same tomato. They also lay out the conflict over—well, even in naming the subject, we risk prejudicing the discussion. Are we talking about genetically modified or even Frankenfoods as in Frankenstein ; or are we talking about a new Green Revolution? This is a controversy where language not only defines but also is part of the problem. Both sides would agree that we are talking about food whose genetic properties have been altered through technology, often by splicing a desired gene from one species—the cold tolerance of a mackerel, for example—into the genetic code of another species, such as a tomato.

According to the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, last year, The vast majority of this acreage is given over to herbicide-tolerant soybeans and insect-resistant corn. These facts are about the end of the agreement on genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. Then the war of images takes over. Calkins points out that many opponents are not really making an argument so much as calling on a whole complex of culturally suggestive images.

The butterfly costumes refer specifically to the monarch, which a study published in Nature magazine reports may be harmed by pollen from modified corn. But the costumes also "call up our previous abuses of other voiceless creatures—the snail darters, the passenger pigeons, the Carolina parakeets," Calkins says. In general, he argues, opponents have been good at drawing on language and image to create doubt about genetic engineering.

The truth is, many people have a touch of the heebie-jeebies at the notion of playing with the basic building blocks of life—the genes. Bioengineering is just a more refined process, which will probably result in more productive animals and plants at a lower cost than traditional breeding methods. Is genetic manipulation just an extension of age-old methods of husbandry, or is the transgenic aspect of this crossbreeding a difference more in kind than degree?

When adherents of opposing views on this question butt heads, the result is a stalemate on the order of controversies over abortion and capital punishment, Calkins believes. On the other hand, you have those who hold that there are a whole number of competing goods, and that we must weigh those goods in a pragmatic or utilitarian way. The Catholic Church has come down somewhere in the middle: four square against tampering with the human genome but ready to give a "prudent yes" to the engineering of plants and animals. As Elio Sgreccia, vice president of the Roman Catholic Pontifical Academy for Life, told the Catholic News Service, "We are increasingly encouraged that the advantages of genetic engineering of plants and animals are greater than the risks.

The risks should be carefully followed through openness, analysis, and controls, but without a sense of alarm. What are the risks? Here, the war of the metaphors begins in earnest. In evaluating the risks, "you can draw analogies to several other new technologies developed over the past 50 years," Starbird says. Instead he claimed that United was simply following the law and that the protesting customer was a problem that needed to be removed. But just because something is legal does not mean it is ethical. Just like an individual, corporations have to take social responsibility, called corporate social responsibility.

This is responsibility that goes beyond economic and legal obligations and instead encourages companies to contribute in a positive way to society. Corporate social responsibility promotes a system of Triple Bottom Line Reporting people, planet, profits. Without farms there would not be food, so treating farmers their customers more respectfully and allowing them to replant seeds gives us more food and gives them more freedom to run their own business. They would save money from reusing seeds and invest that money into more land, which would in turn allow them to purchase more Monsanto seeds. That grows Monsanto profits, takes care of their people and is good for the planet because food is not wasted.

For this situation I think that using a Teleological framework is the most practical particularly a Utilitarian approach because it is easier to list out logical outcomes than it is to identify the principles of the entire company. Principles that apply to me are not universal, so therefore it is hard to speak for an entire organization. The chart below shows different ethical frameworks and their prospective solutions to the Monsanto crisis. EX: Utilitarianism Deontological Framework. They can feed more people, create plants that can protect us from disease and create new jobs.

An improvement just needs to be made in their business practices. By increasing public relations, improving their treatment of farmers and educating the public, Monsanto would become more socially responsible and better their reputation. As is the case with most ethical issues, people have a wide variety of opinions. These opinions take many forms, and it seems like everyone from mainstream media to bloggers have taken an interest in the Monsanto issue. Multiple blogs have been created to speak out against Monsanto, and there have been marches and other forms of protest to raise awareness about the issues facing the agriculture giant.

One blog, organicconsumers. Their site also encourages extensive fundraising to support their claim. According to their home page, the authors of the site feel that Monsanto is burying the truth that Roundup causes cancer. Overall I would say that the website looks poorly designed and has a conspiracy-theory-like feel. The authors have strong views about Monsanto, which in their case seems reasonable. After all they only eat organically and Monsanto encourages genetically modified foods. I have to say that their headlines seem a lot less extreme than some of the other blog sites I visited.

Another anti-Monsanto blog with a good standing on the Google search rankings is march-against-monsanto. This site has a bright red, bold countdown for their next march which will be on May 20th, They think it is wrong for the government to require school-age children to be vaccinated before attending public school, as that is seen as an infringement on their rights. In my personal opinion, both of these blogs seem pretty extreme, the later being more extreme than the former. I think both sites are very one-sided and look for information that confirms their point of view confirmation bias.

I also believe pretty strongly that all children should be vaccinated, so adding that perspective into march-against-monsanto. The fact that an alternative news aggregate site supports their mission is a little terrifying. Anyways… switching gears towards mainstream media, articles written in Forbes have an interesting perspective on the Monsanto crisis. Forbes has rated Monsanto as number nine on a list for the ten most innovative companies in America. Other corporations to grace that list include Amazon, Red Hat and Salesforce.

Another interesting article written in Forbes argues that most people do not understand what GMO foods actually are, or what the difference is between GMOs and organically grown foods. According to this article, nearly all foods have had their genomes altered including organic and natural products. This technique has brought us wheat commonly used in bread and pasta, peppermint, and certain types of pears or grapefruits.

These products can be sold as organic and are not considered GMOs. But they are still altered by something other than the natural environment. As for people fighting against corporate evil, Whole Foods generated more revenue than Monsanto in coming in with just over 15 billion dollars. There are over a thousand different patented plants, and most patents on genetically engineered products have a limited lifespan. GMO seeds can even help make the world a better place. Monsanto is working on making non-browning apples and potatoes to decrease food waste. They are hoping that consumers will not throw them out due to brown spots or bruises. Gluten-free wheat will help people with celiac disease by allowing them to eat bread or pasta without getting sick.

Bananas resistant to xanthomonas wilt will increase crop yields and food sources for people in eastern Africa and Uganda who are struggling to find enough to eat. Finally, I checked out YouTube. A popular source for bloggers and the opinionated general public, I wanted to see what people on social media had to say. Monsanto denied that their products had anything to do with the issue at the time, but the Director of PR affairs later came out and admitted that Monsanto was in the wrong, but the company was changing. In the company refocused on agriculture, and the video argued that a lot of people resent GMO foods simply because they are not given a choice, and because GM products are not labeled labelling for GMOs is not required by the FDA.

The herbicides supposedly cause the Nosama Virus in honey bees, collapsing entire colonies, and the pesticide Laso even poisoned a farmer in France causing the product to be banned in that country. Many other people have an issue with the power the corporation holds over consumers. Only Monsanto seeds are resistant to Roundup so you have to buy Monsanto seeds, farmers are aggressively pursued with lawsuits to protect IP and a massive amount of money is spent on lobbying Congress to push bills through.

Someone in the video made the counter-argument that Westerners Americans have created this problem themselves from their desire to consume. We as a society want cheap food available to us at all times of the year. To fix this issue the video argued that we should spend more time shopping from local farms. After watching this video I am reminded of how tricky this issue is. Originally I did not support Monsanto because of how they treated their farmers. I still do not support all of their frivolous lawsuits, but I do support their mission to feed as many people as possible. I agree that GMO foods should have labels, but that is an FDA thing not necessarily a Monsanto thing even if they are lobbying against labeling.

I also understand that the majority of foods I consume probably are genetically modified I recently just consumed blueberries the size of an eraser. Apple iPhone chargers only work with iPhones and nobody seems to be crying over that. I think improving crops to increase food yields and decrease food waste is the right idea, but Monsanto seems to be taking a Machiavellian approach. March Against Monsanto Senapathy, K. Sharf, S. Ten Most Innovative Companies in America. Trusts, or large monopolies, were corporations that combined and lowered their prices to drive competitors out of the business. This infuriated many americans at that time because it allowed such a small number of people to become wealthy, or even successful at all.

When Theodore Roosevelt became president, he sympathized with workers unlike most of the presidents in the past who usually tried to help the corporations. As illustrated in Document A, Roosevelt wanted to hunt down the bad trusts ad put a leash on the good ones in order to regulate them. However, it only had a limited effect because the government was unable to control the activity of banks and railroads which were two of the most powerful industries in the world. This argument could also appeal to pathos, especially if someone watching it is also an undocumented working or was one in the past.

Seeing how people are taken advantage of simply because they are undocumented is often not fair and to have such large companies such as Walmart continue to be a part of it and act on that is quite shocking indeed. The third argument that is presented in this documentary was the factory conditions that workers outside of the United States put up with in creating products for Walmart. Factory conditions are shown to be horrible in the documentary and many Walmart employees were shocked to see. The harmful memes have been spread more so throughout people than the harmless ones.

Thus giving us, the tycoons that run these expensive corporations making natural resources like food and water, a hassle to get. They do not care about the needs of others but only the needs of the company and themselves. Migrant Workers Migrant workers are a vital part of our nation. They are very important to the maintenance of America as well as other companies. Although they do a lot of good things for our nation, they are considered bad. Some people could argue that they are stealing jobs from Americans, and they are getting away with not paying their taxes to help our nation's economy. I feel that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks of having them in our country. Klein describes how one of the major problems caused by lifestyle branding is that it is weakening our democracy Klein.

The reason it is causing this is because there is not many places we can go to now where we are not surrounded by brands and do not have to look each other as consumers but as regular citizens. The super brand is when a company is tries to outstretch its. Herbicide is a pesticide used to kill unwanted plants and some of those unwanted plants are milkweed. Its an important plant to the monarchs because it gives energy while migrating to faraway places and where the next generation continues. Without milkweed the monarchs would not be able to survive that long to their adult years. Grudem, W. More people would probably start businesses, if they did not see them as evil.

There are many negative thoughts in the world towards business, and rightly so. We hear about high priced executives with wild spending habits, exploitation of young labor, and their unethical business practices.

Seeing how people are taken advantage of simply because Essential Oil Benefits are undocumented What Is Monsantos Ethical Reasoning? often not Summary: The Effects Of Acid Rain and to have such large companies such as Walmart continue Generalized Anxiety Disorder Analysis be a part of advantages of interview and act on that is quite shocking indeed. March against Monsanto, 15 Amendment Research Paper credit: Joe Brusky. Works Cited Ferrell, O.