Daily Bleat Summary
Help Learn to edit Daily Bleat Summary portal Recent changes Upload file. Polonius questions her about it, and she tells High School Interim Reflection that she has stopped spending time with Hamlet as Polonius requested. She is The Things They Carried Critical Analysis Essay musician Resistance In The Handmaids Tale not deemed talented High School Interim Reflection to be considered cost effective Rocky Flats Argumentative Essay keeping around. Plus, there have been Daily Bleat Summary many dystopias published since Rocky Flats Argumentative Essay, surely it would be very The Things They Carried Critical Analysis Essay for an older novel to be better than newer ones? I haven't read anything else like Rocky Flats Argumentative Essay
Daily Activity - English Learning Video with Ms. Timor - Kampung Inggris Genta
A character commits suicide. And, as tragedies tend to do, the play ends with more death. Read the background information for Hamlet. Read this summary for Hamlet. Read the character list. Grammar Another function of a noun is object complement. This is when a noun follows a direct object and gives it another name. Example: They made him king. Him is the direct object. King is the object complement. A noun of direct address is a proper noun. It is the name of who is being spoken to directly in a sentence or question. Examples: Where are you going, John? John is the noun of direct address.
Sarah is the noun of direct address. A noun of direct address should be offset from the rest of the sentence by commas. You will use it several times. Look for how Hamlet describes his relationship and how others describe their relationship. Also examine how they interact when they are together. Read between the lines and analyze the dialogue. Read Act I Scene I. What is the mood in the opening scene?
What are some specific word choices Shakespeare used to create this mood? In this opening scene, we have several guards at the royal palace in Denmark. There is an exchange of the guards for their watch shifts. Two of the guards, Bernardo and Marcellus, discuss that for the past two nights they have seen the ghost of the late King of Denmark. Horatio, considered to be a wise scholar, has been brought along for this third night as a witness. The ghost appears and quickly disappears. Did you catch what was happening? Denmark was preparing for a possible invasion by Norway. The prince of Norway also called Fortinbras was rumored to be plotting an invasion of Denmark. Since Denmark had lost their king, they might appear weaker and Fortinbras could seek revenge by taking over what Denmark ruled.
The ghost gives the players just enough time to explain this backstory for the audience before appearing again. Horatio tries to speak to the ghost, but it remains quiet. He tries to get Marcellus and Bernardo to capture it. Their weapons only touch the air. The ghost seems like it is about to speak, but a rooster crows and the ghost disappears. Horatio decides they should tell Prince Hamlet about this, and the men agree as the scene ends.
Writing Think about what resources you would use to find out more information about your research topic. Read this overview of evaluating sources of information. Discuss with someone what would be good resources vs. Lesson 58 Vocabulary Define the following terms in your vocabulary notebook: discretion , auspicious , dirge , visage , denote , countenance , requite, dole — sadness; grief; sorrow Reading Even though I will be giving you some summary and commentary, I still want you to carefully read through these scenes before you look at my notes. Try to take notes on your assigned worksheets and write your general thoughts down as you read. You will have responses to literature journal entries to write for each Act of this play, so you may want to take notes on things that jump out at you as you read.
Claudius says that he is in mourning for his brother, but is celebrating his marriage. He also comments on the military action the guards were discussing in the previous scene. Claudius has sent two of his men, Cornelius and Voltemand, to Norway in order to seal these peace talks. Laertes has been visiting from France and wants to return. Claudius gives him permission to return to France. During all of this discussion, Prince Hamlet has been standing off to the side not joining these happy exchanges going on with King Claudius. Hamlet has some really great lines here.
He is discussing his grief over losing his father. He avoids directly responding to some of what Claudius says. He also uses puns and some snarky responses. He wants Hamlet to accept it and move on with his life. Claudius requests that Hamlet stay in Denmark with them instead of going to back to school in Wittenberg. Gertrude says she wants that, too. Hamlet agrees to stay. Everyone except Hamlet leaves the stage. Have you been making notes in your Act I chart? There has been a lot of information revealed in this scene. How does Hamlet feel about his father? His uncle? How does he feel about his mother marrying his uncle?
Hamlet is joined by the trio from Scene 1. We learn a little about his relationship with Horatio. Make note of that on your chart. Hamlet plans to wait with them that night to try to see the ghost himself. Grammar There are several classes of nouns: common, proper, singular, plural, concrete, abstract, count, noncount, collective, and compound. Read about the functions and classes of nouns here. Take this quiz on nouns. Check the answers. Record your grade out of 11 instead of 12, so you can have a potential for extra credit. Lesson 59 Vocabulary Define the following terms in your vocabulary notebook: calumnious calumny , precept , perilous , importuned Reading Read Act I Scene III Here we have a family scene in great contrast to the previous one.
Laertes is preparing to leave and is saying his farewells to his sister, Ophelia. Hamlet is brought up in the conversation because Ophelia and Hamlet care for one another. Laertes gives Ophelia a warning in his advice. He reminds Ophelia that Hamlet is bound to his allegiance to the nation and may not choose Ophelia when he has to choose. It is similar to the idea of Proverbs It seems a little strange, but you have to remember the patriarchal society of the time. Marriages were sometimes used as peace contracts and business arrangements. Ophelia gives her brother an interesting response. She promises to follow his advice, but then she throws it back to him.
She tells him not to be a hypocrite who might preach to her the right way to live, but not make the same choices himself. Laertes says he will not be a hypocrite. Polonius, their father, arrives. He gives him lots of advice including a couple of famously quoted lines. Did you catch them? Laertes leaves after reminding Ophelia of what they talked about. Polonius asks Ophelia about it, and she says they were discussing Hamlet. Ophelia tries to explain that Hamlet has been honorable and has expressed genuine feelings and vows to her.
He tells Ophelia to spend less time with Hamlet and to not accept his love letters to her. She agrees. Scene IV takes us back to night watch. Hamlet is with Horatio and Marcellus as they wait to see if the ghost will reappear. The sound of cannons is coming from the castle. Hamlet says they are a sign that Claudius is drinking pledges. Hamlet talks of his opposition to so much drinking and says that it has made Denmark look foolish to surrounding nations. The ghost appears and Hamlet asks for it to speak. It calls for him to follow it away from the other men. Horatio and Marcellus try to keep Hamlet from following it.
They are worried about what might happen to Hamlet. Hamlet brushes off their concern and even threatens to kill them if they prevent him from going after the ghost. He follows the ghost and the other men follow at a distance. Scene V has Hamlet alone with the ghost. The ghost speaks and tells Hamlet that he is in Purgatory being tormented for his sins. The ghost tells Hamlet that it was not a snake that killed the king as everyone believed, but this was murder. The ghost says Claudius, his own brother, poisoned him while he took his usual nap in his garden. He wants Hamlet to seek revenge, but he wants him to spare his mother. Then the ghost disappears. Hamlet is angry and distressed at this news. He swears he will kill Claudius. Horatio and Marcellus arrive.
In a strange little sequence, the ghost begins speaking along with Hamlet as Hamlet repeatedly makes the men swear secrecy. Hamlet also tells them that his behavior may confuse and surprise them, but he has a reason for it. The scene ends with him leading the men away as he begins to think of his revenge. Write a Response to Literature about Act I. What do we discover about the situation in Scene I? Scene 2? What do we learn about Gertrude, Claudius, and Hamlet in Scene 2? How does the royal family parallel with Polonius, Laertes, and Ophelia? Grammar Next in parts of speech is the verb. A verb has 5 principal parts: infinitive, present, past, present participle, and past participle. Other examples of infinitives are: to eat, to sleep, to drive.
So, that will depend on the person 1 st , 2 nd , 3 rd and the number singular, plural. The past is pretty easy to remember. Read about the present participle. This will vary depending on if the verb is regular or irregular. Read this worksheet for more of an explanation of the participle. It will cover Lesson 55 to Lesson In this act, many characters are creating different schemes to determine what is going on with another character.
As you read, complete the chart by writing about the different plans and what the hoped effect is for each. Polonius is talking with a servant, Reynaldo, about Laertes. Laertes has returned to Paris and Polonius wants to make sure his son is behaving himself. Polonius gives Reynaldo some very specific instructions on how to find out this information. He wants Reynaldo to ask random people in Paris about any well-known Danes living in the city. Reynaldo is not to mention Laertes by name, but he is to wait for his name to be brought up by someone else. He is then to tell the person that what he knows of Laertes is that he spent most of his youth gambling, drinking, fighting and just generally not living a very decent life. Polonius finishes his plan for spying on Laertes and sends Reynaldo off.
Polonius really wants to control his children and his reputation. Ophelia enters the scene and she is very upset. Hamlet has been acting so strangely lately and his recent visit with her was very disturbing. Polonius questions her about it, and she tells him that she has stopped spending time with Hamlet as Polonius requested. He describes him as being mad. He decides that Hamlet must have really loved Ophelia. Polonius leaves to tell Claudius and Gertrude that he believes he knows why Hamlet has been acting so bizarre. Writing When taking notes during your research, it is important to be aware of possible plagiarism. Are you taking notes in summary, paraphrasing, or directly quoting?
These notes will be part of your writing. When sitting down to write your paper, you may not remember if you had directly quoted from a source or if you paraphrased as you were note taking. One method for taking notes and organizing them thoughtfully involves creating note cards usually on index cards. Here is a list of 10 tips for research note cards. Lesson 62 Vocabulary Define the following terms in your vocabulary notebook: quintessence , cleave , malefactions calamity — disaster; cause of great distress Reading Read Act II Scene II. NOTE: Stop at line There is a lot going on in this one scene. Were you able to catch all of it?
He is to wait until his ambassadors Voltemand and Cornelius give their update from Norway. The news from Norway is that King Fortinbras has been able to hold back his nephew from invading Denmark. However, the young Fortinbras wants to invade Poland and he requests that Denmark allow him travel through their land to complete this goal. Polonius talks quite a bit in this scene. Queen Gertrude does not seem to have a lot of patience for him. Polonius has a plan for Claudius to join him in spying on an exchange between Hamlet and Ophelia. Claudius agrees to this plan. Hamlet enters the scene and Polonius asks to be alone with him. Polonius leaves. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern enter to meet Hamlet. After a little bit of an exchange, the two men admit that the king and queen sent for them to report on Hamlet.
Hamlet gives an emotional speech. Rosencrantz tells Hamlet about the arrival of some actors from London. Polonius enters with the players. Hamlet tells the players that he wants them to perform The Murder of Gonzago. They agree to do this and then they leave. Hamlet is left alone and he tells the audience his plan. Hamlet will write some lines for the play that will be the exact reenactment of how the ghost described the murder. Hamlet believes Claudius will reveal his guilt. Think about the following questions for Act II for possibilities to write about for your entry: Why does this act begin with the exchange between Polonius and Reynaldo? What does this tell us about Polonius? What theme does it introduce into the play and how is that theme further shown in this act?
What do we learn about Hamlet from his interaction with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern? How so? Grammar A verb has four verb types. These are intransitive, transitive, linking, and helping. Think about transitive being related to the word transfer. A transitive verb transfers action to an object. An intransitive verb does not transfer action to an object. Transitive: Alison pet the dog. Pet is a transitive verb here because it transfers action from the subject Alison to the object dog.
Intransitive: Adam sings. Sings is an intransitive verb because there is no action being transferred to an object. There is no object. A linking verb is exactly what it says. It links two words. It joins them together. An example of a linking verb: Shayla feels tired. Feels is linking Shayla and tired. Helping verbs sometimes called auxiliary verbs are also self-explanatory. A helping verb is helping another verb to show action or existence or being. An example would be, Shayla is taking a nap. The helping verb is helps the verb taking in this sentence. Read through this verb worksheet. As you read, you will be recording events which will be leading up to the climax.
Write down a few important details of the plot. Make any notes that apply to your chart. Do not read the analysis. You may organize your note cards into stacks based on a central theme. Can you find a few main ideas in your note cards? These can serve as your main ideas of your outline. Then concentrate on each stack individually to break that down into possible subheading topics and supporting details for those subheadings. From here, you can begin to formulate your outline.
The detailed notes are still needed later. Lesson 64 Vocabulary Define the following terms in your vocabulary notebook: perceive , pious , abominably resolution — firmness, resolve buffet — to hit or strike against Reading As we continue on in the play, there will be some parts we will not be reading through directly. William Shakespeare liked to use puns and jokes to entertain his audiences.
Some of these were not very polite or appropriate. We will skip reading those parts, but we will be focusing on the important plot aspects of the scenes instead. Continue taking notes for Act III on your worksheet. He tells them how they should perform the play naturally and not overact. The members of the court and the rest of the audience begin to arrive. Hamlet takes Horatio aside to talk to him. Here the audience finds out that Hamlet has told Horatio at least some part of what the ghost told Hamlet. Hamlet tells Horatio that part of the play is very close to what the ghost told him. He wants Horatio to watch King Claudius carefully to catch his reaction to the reenactment of the murder.
This would convince Hamlet whether the ghost is an evil spirit or the honest ghost of his father. The play begins with a dumb show or a pantomime. This was a popular part of English drama. There were no lines in the pantomime. This particular pantomime shows a man murdering a king while he slept in his garden. In the pantomime, at first the queen is devastated, but she then marries the murderer who has become the new king.
The pantomime ends and the real play begins. It has the same story as the pantomime. Hamlet asks Gertrude what she thinks of the play. Hamlet begins to narrate this part and tells the room that soon the murderer will win over the widowed queen. Claudius stands and asks for the lights to be lit. The play is stopped. Claudius and his royal court quickly leave. Hamlet says he can now trust the ghost. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern enter. They tell Hamlet that the King is very unhappy and that Queen Gertrude wants Hamlet to come speak with her. Hamlet says he will do as he is told. He then speaks to Guildenstern in puns. Hamlet tells Guildenstern that he is manipulative and expresses his anger at how Guildenstern has treated Hamlet since being called to Denmark by Claudius.
Polonius enters and tells Hamlet to go see his mother. Hamlet speaks in more riddles and confusion to Polonius, then tells everyone to leave. Hamlet speaks alone about the hour being late and the time of evil spirits approaching. He says he will have to be cruel to his mother to do what needs to be done next. These are typically categorized as person, number, voice, and mood. Person and number are pretty simple. Person can be 1 st I or we , 2 nd you , or 3 rd he, she, it, or they. Number is singular 1 or plural more than 1. A sentence using an active voice verb is one where the subject performs the action.
Example: Shakespeare wrote Hamlet. Passive voice means the subject is receiving the action. Example: Hamlet was written by Shakespeare. Read about active and passive voice. Record your grade out of 20, not Define the following terms in your vocabulary notebook: clemency — leniency; mercy beguile — to deceive; to cheat contagion — what causes a disease ex. Read the summary here. Gertrude tells Hamlet that he has offended his father Claudius. Hamlet responds that the Queen has offended his father King Hamlet.
Hamlet is very angry and scares Gertrude with his behavior. She cries out that she fears he will murder her. Polonius still behind the tapestry cries out for help. Hamlet is enraged and he stabs through the tapestry with a sword. Polonius falls down dead. Hamlet says he thought he was stabbing Claudius. Hamlet very quickly turns to Gertrude and begins to speak angrily to her again. He accuses her of having a part in the murder of his father. Gertrude is confused by his mention of killing the king. Hamlet continues by showing Gertrude a picture of Claudius and King Hamlet side by side.
He talks of how great a man and how handsome his father was. Gertrude sees Hamlet essentially talking to himself and she is sure he is insane. Hamlet tells his mother he is not mad, but is in full control of himself. He begs her to seek forgiveness for her actions and asks her to reject Claudius. She is upset and worried for Hamlet. Hamlet tells her that Claudius is making him return to England.
Hamlet tells his mother good night and he drags away the body of Polonius. What does having this look at Claudius change for you as a reader? What do you think about this? Why might Hamlet be acting this way? He almost kills his uncle, but changes his mind. He rashly kills Polonius. Use your Act III worksheet and think about what themes are repeated in this act. Writing How are you feeling about the research paper? Have you started on some ideas? Take some time to go back through the last couple of weeks from Lesson Look over the process in writing to see if there are any parts you may be able to work on now.
Show someone where you are at with your planning. Ask them for some feedback. Look over this sample research paper in MLA Format. This is a longer paper than what you will be writing, but the model is appropriate. Here is another sample paper. You will be looking for words and phrases used to create the imagery of corruption, disease, and death. These scenes are very brief. Scene 1: Gertrude tells Claudius that Hamlet is mad, and in his madness he has killed Polonius. Claudius says it could have been him behind that arras.
He speaks against what Hamlet has done, but blames himself for not controlling Hamlet better. He asks where Hamlet has gone. Gertrude says that he has gone to take care of the body and that he has shown remorse for his actions. Claudius tells Gertrude they should send Hamlet away and must prepare for how to handle this situation with their people. He calls for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Claudius tells them what happened. He tells them to go find Hamlet and bring the body to the chapel.
When they leave, Claudius tells Gertrude they should seek wise counsel on how to share this with their subjects without having the blame cast on them. The next two scenes have Hamlet playing with puns and some clever use of language. Hamlet uses word play with his responses to them and he insults them. He refers to them as sponges in the hands of the king. Hamlet agrees to go with them to see King Claudius. Scene 3: King Claudius is meeting with some men. Any action taken against Hamlet would be met with protests by the people, so it is best to send him away. Hamlet is brought to the king and Claudius asks for the body of Polonius.
Hamlet plays with his words again talking about death and decay. Claudius tells Hamlet they will be sending him to England for safety. When everyone else is gone, Claudius gives a brief soliloquy where he speaks of the King of England owing him a favor. He says killing Hamlet would repay that favor. Read this summary and analysis of Scene 4. Indicative is usually the way a verb is used. This is when a verb is used to state something or to ask a question. Example: Washington D. Have you ever been to Washington D. Imperative means the verb is used to state a command.
Example: Brush your teeth. Read about the subjunctive here. An example from our current play: To be or not to be, that is the question. The infinitive mood of a verb can include participle forms ending in -ed and -ing. She has lost her father and Hamlet is gone. Ophelia is singing snippets of different songs and not responding directly to any questions on how she is doing. It is remarked that she is overcome with grief and is acting irrational. Ophelia goes to leave. King Claudius orders Horatio to keep an eye on her out of concern for the already unsettled state.
They are loyal to him and there is talk of Laertes leading a revolt against the king and queen. Gertrude and Claudius try to calm Laertes as Ophelia enters the room again. Claudius assures him that he is blameless. He tells Laertes that Laertes should ask around to see if any of his trusted friends would say that the kingdom played a part in the blame. Claudius says he will give up his crown and all he has if that is the case. It satisfied both the Pro-life and the Pro-choice armies. The Bill of Life states that human life may not be touched from the moment of conception until a child reaches the age of thirteen.
However, between the ages of thirteen and eighteen, a parent may choose to retroactively "abort" a child The process by which a child is both terminated and yet kept alive is called "unwinding. It's a little hard to swallow, yes? When I initially saw this page I thought "Geez, a little dramatic. I'm not sure how he's going to make this seem realistic, but I'll follow along and keep an open mind. When I think of how utterly disturbing an "unwinding" would be, I found myself riddled with all types of questions. What happens in an unwinding? Will we be privy to a procedure? Is this going to be highly graphic and full of blood and guts? How is this being marketed as a YA novel? Here's what I found out after reading this book; yes, we find out what happens specifically in an unwinding and are privy to one, but just one, and it is highly disturbing in the most subtle way.
What surprised me the most though was the lack of graphic violence aside from one major scene near the end. The reason this book is so utterly brilliant is due to the fact that the author has left most of the highly disturbing factors vague; he knew for each reader, what would move us the most, would be different and has given us the opportunity to let our imagination carry us where he couldn't take us with too much structure and detail. I'd rather be partly great than entirely useless.
The story is divided into seven parts, each told from multiple views, but mainly from three. Risa is a ward of the state and is set to be unwound due to the lack of space in the institutions housing orphans. She is a musician but not deemed talented enough to be considered cost effective in keeping around. Lev is a tithe; these are children conceived and raised specifically to be unwound once they reach the age of thirteen. These three lines converge at a specific event and begin what I like to consider the first part of our journey. I won't give away anything else, but we ride lots of ups and downs with these folks. The ending was satisfying in the sense that it clearly is left with the assumption of a series following, but there isn't a giant cliff hanger where you feel pressured to pick up the next book immediately.
In fact, I've seen most people choose to read this as a standalone and not continue on. Either way, this is a book that is worth your time; it's far from your typical, sometimes flimsy YA novel. There was actually a good bit of "real life" research that went into this story; Shusterman found various news articles surrounding stem cell research that helped form a base for his fictional story to be crafted around. I know this because I took the time to look up each link he provided and, by George, they are real!
And horrifying! Yes, it's highly disturbing, horrifying, and a place our mind doesn't even want to venture to, but this book touched on so many issues in our current state of affairs world wide and is surprisingly still relevant after nearly ten years. Stem Cell Research, Cellular Memory, Reproductive Rights, the afterlife, faith, and morals; it's all discussed in this book. I found myself constantly pondering all of the above and how it relates to humanity. As a parent, this was a hard book to stomach. It brought an all-too-real sense of terror over me that I couldn't shake, and still haven't. The Roland scene was one where I had to put the book down, wipe the tears from my eyes, and process before I could continue on to finish.
The reason this book can even have the potential of being beloved by so many is this: amidst all the horror and unspeakable evil the plot is founded on, there is a constant glimmer of hope in the horizon. It's a beautiful thing folks. It's all there, and that's why I'm going to recommend this book to literally everyone I come in contact with. I could ramble on for weeks about this book, but I think it would be better if you just read it for yourself. I'm also planning on continuing the series, so I'll try to provide insight into whether or not it's worth investing in the long haul or just soaking up this treasure by itself. View all 31 comments. Shelves: fiction-dsytopian-post-apocalyptic , , event-missed-author , physical-own. You are not going to believe me, but I came to this book with open arms.
It survived weeks of cuts and call-backs to become one of the final six books that were carefully wrapped in pajamas before being placed in the suitcase and flown to Switzerland. Well, given the length of this trip, space constraints, and my mercurial ways, they also had to be relatively thin, paperback, and fast-paced, but you get my point. Alas, from the very first c You are not going to believe me, but I came to this book with open arms. Alas, from the very first chapter, I was wrinkling my nose. Meet Connor.
He has gotten into some fist fights at school and has bouts of anger, but is fundamentally a good kid. I like him well enough. Unwinding is an interesting, if poorly explored, idea. But the selection of candidates is where I start to rebel. Your children may frustrate and exhaust you, but deep down, there is this primal urge to see them survive and thrive. Even childless me can think of dozens of examples of family and friends loving their offspring despite rough patches.
Heck, my sister drove my mother bananas during her teenage years. We were only a mile from home and it was a scenic walk through pastures, yet it sure left an impression on twelve year old Cassy sitting in the back seat. Never going to happen! However, Shusterman portrays them as a middle class, respectable household making a socially acceptable decision. In fact, they have another son that they adore. The sad thing is this stumbling block was easily removable.
Imagine that due to a government regulation aimed at population control, you can only have one child pass the age of twenty-one. With such a brief explanation, Shusterman would have appeased me. I accept that during a nasty divorce, the two embittered sides would rather dispose of their child than let the other gain custody. I completely buy that a state ward would be unwound due to limited space and budget cuts. My other quibble is the lack of effort Shusterman showed in establishing his world. I know the setting is the United States sometime in the future several decades? The people still use cell phones, drive cars, and eat chicken.
At one point, Shusterman makes a lame attempt to suggest advancement by displaying iPods at an antique store. Oh, look at those cute, pink iPod Nanos! I think my grandmother used one of those! Perhaps my critique of his imagination is unfair. The cover and premise led me to believe this would be science-fiction. I would now assign it to the dystopian category. Even if all the above is outside the scope of what Shusterman wanted to accomplish, I still feel entitled to more about who gets the organs from the unwound. Who coordinates the transplants? How are recipients prioritized? Do they pay for organs? How much? Are there cosmetic transplants or are they allowed for only medical necessitates? The one nod I will give Shusterman in this regard: he alludes to how prevalence of unwinding has halted all other medical advances.
Why bother trying to understand heart disease when new hearts are so readily available? And the ending. We are privy to an actual unwinding surgery and it is chilling to watch a character being dissembled. Ultimately, though, the ending is sprinkled with more underdeveloped tidbits. It is possible to remove tattoos nowadays! Have they forgotten how? Kazuo Ishiguro wrote a book which uses a similar device to address a similar question and whose subtle touch I found to be far more effectual. View all 68 comments. Sep 26, C. Drews rated it it was amazing Shelves: dystopian , ya-male-narrators , horror , 5-star , young-adult. I'm torn here, struggling whether to recommend this book or shout to you never to pick up this book because you will not sleep again!
I mean it! This is a horror, thriller dystopian and I cannot say loud enough that this is not a book for everyone. I believe you need to read a book before you can say you hate it. But, honestly, I think you need to be aware that this is a horror before you go into it. When does life start? When does it end? And who should be allowed to end it? The book is full of real questions — questions people ask today and struggle to come up with answers.
At first I struggled to figure out if the author was for or against abortion. Now I realize, I struggled to figure it out because the author was careful to write, with detail and precision, both sides to the story. There are always 2 sides in a story. Instead of aborting unborn children, this futuristic government has made laws to protect their lives. Instead, a child — between the ages of 13 and 18 — can be unwound. Unwinding is like organ donating. They take your organs and give them to people who need them — cancer patients, car-accident victims, sick, mangled or disease ridden people. The question in the book is: what value is whose life?
Yes, I worded that right. Unwinding does happen. But it has been known to happen. Stop and think about that for a second, eh? After you read this book, you will never I repeat, never say that phrase again. I have to add in here, too, that the writing of this book is brilliant. Considering I want to write a little like that, I was excited to try it out. The author hooked me in with his brilliant, real characters. Next his style of writing. Then his plot. Then the themes of his book. Between all that, there was no way I could avoid some serious thinking. It makes you think. About unwanted children, and futuristic governments, and the horror of mind-manipulation.
One thing that really struck with me was the unwanted children part. So many children are unwanted. In our day-and-age, babies are aborted. Whose fault is that? How do we treat them? This book throws questions in your face and demands you think about them. I loved the characters Connor and Risa best of all; Lev kind of annoyed me until the end. They were real and tangible and they developed with such ease that I was left feeling gobsmacked. The author has an implicit way with crafting characters. And the plot was breathtaking — full of twists and turns.
It wasn't so much the description, but what wasn't described that left you reeling. And the ending…saying it was brutal and torturous and so effortlessly written would be an understatement. The ending will change your mind. You will be moved. You will be challenged. You will cry if not outside, inside. This is a disturbing book. It will play in your mind for days. But you know what? I think books like these are important — extremely important.
View all 18 comments. Apr 24, Kiki rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Everyone, everywhere. Shelves: dystopian , awesome-heroine , favorites , waterworks , awesome-ya , will-read-the-next-one , love-rocks-yeah-yeah , books-that-changed-my-life. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. Of late, we've seen the YA dystopia trend grow to dizzying heights. Many like to bleat that every post-apocalyptic adventure published within the last year is trying to grab the success of The Hunger Games , just as we've all assumed that authors of YA paranormal romance are trying to jump on the Meyer bandwagon.
We're being conditioned to accuse every dystopian author of being a scammer, and every book before we've even read it and discovered that no, it doesn't have anything to do with Collin' Of late, we've seen the YA dystopia trend grow to dizzying heights. We're being conditioned to accuse every dystopian author of being a scammer, and every book before we've even read it and discovered that no, it doesn't have anything to do with Collin's already derivative plot of being a loserific rip-off.
Those who believe this: stop. Because I can say, without a shadow of a doubt, that this book is better than The Hunger Games. First of all; the world-building is spectacular. It's all related to an issue we face right now : pro-life vs. Being a Wendy Davis fangirl, this book disturbed and touched me on a very deep personal level. It literally changed my life.
Let me elaborate. So: America. The so-called "Heartland War" was fought by pro-choice and pro-life armies as each sought to obliterate the other. What's left is a compromise dictating that human life cannot be touched before adolescence, but between the ages of thirteen and eighteen, a child can be "unwound"; a process by which the child is split apart and all organs Problem children are signed as Unwinds by parents at their wit's end, while tithes are born and raised to be unwound.
The premise didn't convince me at first. I couldn't buy it. I couldn't buy that people would sign off their children to be cut into pieces and scattered around like car parts. But that's the beauty of this book; while The Hunger Games never succeeded in convincing me, this book did. The farther I read, the more invested I became. It's electric, in every sense - the characters, the world, the premise, the writing.
The way tithes were brainwashed became frustrating, just as the "terribles" became nauseatingly tragic. Yes, I'm talking about Roland, a troubled boy sentenced to unwinding by his mother even after he saved her from her violent husband. Written off and judged as dangerous, Roland was unwound at Happy Jack harvest camp yes. Happy Jack. It gets sicker. The best part?
We have front row seats to Roland's unwinding. The narrative continues and we find ourselves watching, helpless, as a team of doctors and nurses cut him into pieces. His fear leaps off the page. Our first and main narrator is Connor, a troubled boy not unlike most of the kids I've known at high school. He's not particularly vicious, spiteful or difficult. He's just a teenage boy on a rough patch. But his parents are lazy and selfish, so they sign him up to be unwound. Connor won't stand for it, though; he finds the order and makes tracks in the middle of the night. Risa is a ward of the state. Due to budget cuts I kid you not she is signed up to be unwound. At her tribunal, in which she's informed she'll be sent to a harvest camp, she's told that she isn't smart or talented enough to be kept alive.
Lev is a tithe, a child born and raised to be signed off as an Unwind as soon as he turns thirteen. His oldest brother is vehemently against the process, but his deeply religious parents have convinced Lev that being tithed is a great honor that he must follow through to the end. The collision of these three characters is the start of this never-ending thrill ride that comes to a screaming stop only on the very last page. The last page is equally as rewarding, so never fear!
My point before, while I was still reading this, is thus: in recent YA and in general, men write better heroines than women. Why is this? Does this depress anyone else? Can we please start having some faith in our own gender, women, and stop letting male writers covet positive and proactive females? Also, interestingly, the romance in Unwind , though light, was more convincing than anything I've read in YA lately. It brought me to tears twice, and only made me love both characters more.
I can't say. Perhaps it's because it never felt like a Romatic Plot Tumor, and it never felt forced. There was no "tightness in my chest" or "shimmering azure pools". It was two people, two desperate teenagers, knowing and accepting and appreciating each other. Though who else thought Connor and Risa should have had the smex? Come on, people. If you're going to be slaughtered in a matter of days and your loved one is right there, all hot and yummy, wouldn't you want to have the smex? The heroine? I loved her just as much as I loved Connor. You know what? Sometimes I loved her more.
Risa is just alive , so filled with personality and integrity and intelligence. She's strong, capable, and entirely independent. Her final fate along with Connor's was a little bittersweet, but on the whole it fully satisfied me. Like, MAN, did it satisfy me. You know when you're really hungry, and then you scarf down a massive Montana's steak with 'shrooms and tomatoes and steak sauce and big fries with salt and vinegar?
That's how satisfied I was. I hope y'all are hungry now. Guise, my ONLY problem with this book lies in the writing. To begin with, I didn't like it. It took a while for me to get into the style of it, and the editing was squiffy as hell: "Just because he's to be unwound does NOT means he's an Unwind. I also don't like all-caps sentences in published works save it for Tumblr, bbys but once I got used to it, it really just stopped bothering me.
And sure, the little blips above irritate me, but there are dozens of gloriously beautiful passages within Unwind that moved me and allowed me to easily forgive Shusterman for the slip-ups. Third person present tense is difficult to pull off, but Shusterman did. And hella kudos for that, broski! Unwind isn't for the faint-hearted. It pushes a lot of very close-to-home questions that might make you squirm. What is the value of life? Does our society unfairly judge youth? Do we give up on troubled children too quickly? Is revenge ever justified? Can you justify cruel means to a kind end? How far would you go to preserve your own life?
What sacrifices would you make? These questions are never explicitly answered by Unwind , and this is what makes this book such a legend. It never preaches, only teaches. It informs, but does not push opinions. It poses questions that are open to be answered by the reader, not the author. It is a very challenging read, but an incredibly rewarding one. On the whole? This book is absolutely excellent. It's probably one of my favourite books of all time.
I adore it. I adore the brilliant characters, the electric premise, the gorgeous writing and the wildly original premise. It's so full of heart. I admit it: I cried twice. I was shocked, disturbed, enlightened, amazed. It grabbed hold of me and drew me in from the first page. It's highly original, and basically, a triumph in every sense of the word. Read it. View all 24 comments. Apr 14, Barbie rated it liked it. My thoughts in a nutshell It could've been better. This was a hate-love relationship with the book. Sadly, I hated it more than I enjoyed it. Overall, I'm disappointed. The story is about… Skip over this point if you don't like the sneak peek.
A new society where the parents can unwind our hated children that means if the child reaches the age of thirteen and eighteen the cops take them away to the harvest camp. In the harvest camp, the children will unwind piece after piece. Their body parts are My thoughts in a nutshell It could've been better. Their body parts are transplanted into different donors. It was unique. Neal Shusterman's ideas always pleasure for me. The Scythe is one of my all-time favorite series. It's really hard not to compare Unwind to Scythe. I enjoyed the first half of the book. The pacing was great. I was excited about what will happen to the main characters.
I generally enjoy it when the protagonist is running away from someone. It gave me shiver and continuously worried about the plot. In the end, something terrible happened, and I was shocked. When I was reading, I had to stop and wait for a couple of minutes because that chapter was disturbing. Usually, I can handle the gory things of the book, but this was brutal. He lies in the operating table and the doctors take him apart while he was conscious and he knew what was happening with him.
When they took out his brain piece by piece, he couldn't speak then he couldn't think In the beginning, I was so angry at him, but through the story, he changes a lot. Connor was also an interesting boy. He feels anger from society and his parents. I totally feel him. I thought he was the most realistic character of all. I love that Shusterman always writes about the likely future of our society. I can imagine that this can happen in the future, or something similar, but I can believe more in what he wrote in Scythe. I was bored most of the time. The Graveyard scene was too long, and I couldn't wait for the end. The school scene was too perfect.
It is not possible, way too artificial. I hate when the author forces the love interest. Unwind's has a great idea, an enjoyable motion, why ruin with a random love interest? I have no idea, and it makes me angry. Risa was an unnecessary character. She's just a shadow. I don't like her. If I cut her out of the story then the book wouldn't have been that long. Problem solved. The ending was the most boring part of the book. After that shocking part, my expectation went higher then it fell. I was skimming the last couple of chapters. It ruined my enjoyment. Make a conclusion I gave it 3 stars because it has a lot of potentials but I was disinterested, and if I'm bored as hell I won't give it 4 stars.
I'm so sorry. I recommend it to anyone who enjoys a thrilling story about our possible society. But, if you want to read a masterpiece, please chose Scythe. Atmosphere collage aka. View all 23 comments. Still disturbingly cool This book is disturbing and just holy crow! These people think it's okay to unwind their children if they don't want them or if they are bad kids. And what is unwinding you ask? AND your body parts are still a part of you, but only your brain can still think inside of another body but the parts can still do things the other kid did, like playing an instrument etc.
No matter how well you do it, that wall ain't never gonna be as good. So my dads made sure I got an entire temporal lobe from a single donor. But that kid wasn't as smart as me. He wasn't no dummy, but he didn't have the The last brain scan put me at That's the top 5 percent of the population, and still considered genius. Just not with a capital G. What's your IQ? They don't put you all the way under, they want to make sure your still functioning.
I had the wonderful time of reading a kid going through this. I didn't like the bully that this was happening to but still. The three main characters of the story are Connor, Risa and Lev. Connor's parents put in the order to unwind him because he was always getting into trouble. Risa was in the system and they needed to make room for more kids at the home. And Lev was a tithe to God. I still can't get over some of the stuff I read in this book. I loved the book though, don't get me wrong. Connor and Risa break free and are on the run. Connor grabs Lev and take him with them. Lev isn't happy about this because he thinks he's supposed to be a tithe, but when his pastor tells him to run he starts to understand.
They all get split up for a bit and Lev runs into another kid called CyFi nickname and this kid isn't on the run because he's not an unwind. He's actually wanted by his father's and he's a stork kid. But CyFi is on a mission because he has part of the brain of another child and that child wants to get something done. I cried at this part because it's so horrific :- At some point they all end up in a plane graveyard where an ex military man takes care of unwinds.
They live here for a short period of time because some kids start some stuff and there is a riot and people are killed. Sigh, it was all stupid actually. I did like the Admiral, he did a lot to help these kids because he and his ex-wife made the mistake of unwinding their child. They changed their mind but they were too late so he dedicated his life to helping others. Oh yeah and the stork babies are babies that are left on your doorstep and you are allowed to keep them. Abortion is illegal but you can put a baby on a doorstep and they can keep the child forever or decide to Unwind it later. Needless to say this book was very disturbing and creepy but I really did enjoy it.
I haven't read anything else like it! Looking at some photos of The Colorado taken over the course of its miles one can appreciate how Americans can get so teary eyed patriotic. Such an epic landscape. As it enters and stutters through Mexico however, The Colorado, which way upstream near its source in the Rockies is still a wild and abundant river, is reduced to little more than a trickle. The Croatian missionary marvelled at the phenomenon of a major springtime tidal bore in the delta and estuary of the lower Colorado. Baja has enough waves as it is. But it seems the Barra de la Cruz local govt.
Since you didn't mention Black water I assume you don't know what I am talking about. And you said you were a river expert. I knew that was BS as well. The mouth of the Mitchell is km as the crow flies from the desal plant, and until this year has been in severe drought. Any functional dam would need to be up in the high country and limit water supply to the Lindenow valley, one of Australia's largest food producing areas. As well as further limit flow into what used to be significant freshwater lakes systems. The generation location would be a bloody long way from any existing HV infrastructure and cost a bomb. Spot on carpetman. Telling everyone that we should damn the Mitchell, while having no clue where the river actually is, is bloody embarrassing Hutchy.
Not even the environmentally destructive LNP are proposing this damn stupid idea. How stupid would you have to be to be 10 years behind Andrew bolt? Ok I was out by miles. Makes no difference to anything I said. I hate the idea we are letting the fresh water from the Mitchell flow into the sea and are sucking in salt water into the de sal plant which is only miles away. The Mitchell River was low , like every other river , VicLocal.
Same with all the other dams and weirs. Sounds you are like all the other thick people who said that there is no point damming the Mitchell because the river is not flowing. Over the last years it has probably flooded times. Carpetman -you say " Dams will be a component of future energy storage but as closed loop systems and not on river. It might take a while to fill a dam that's not on a river or some other water carriage way. How long and which dam in Vic is fed this way? Climate Change. Log in or register to post comments. As I said above -"The only media that is right leaning in Australia is Murdoch and he often picks the other side " Maybe you should let the adults who consistently read discuss this to save you having to catch up?
Hutchy 19 wrote: Hiccup - I do read the Australian and imo it is in the middle with the editorial sometimes leaning right. Hutchy 19 wrote: Hiccup - I just added to my post above. The lunatics are trying to run the asylum today! Ive never read the AFR but media bias fact check says, it's right centre bias. Sky news is dead centre right bias, The Australian centre right bias sits about the same spot SBS sits except right Herald sun centre bias but more to the centre but compared to ABC not as close to the centre I actually think this website is pretty accurate, so if you dont agree chances are it's your own perspective that is off.
Different name but still the biggest wanker going round. Info, your knowledge of left and right would be invaluable Captain Clownshoes. Step right up. Glad he's back. Might have to lurk more. Ha ha Indo the "Yew" gave it away. Still gender bending is an innovation. Time to get back on your meds info. I hear there's wide spread shortages of that medicine though, so good luck getting ahold of any. Indo - I think you are right about viewing the media is in the eye of the beholder.
The AFR is published by Fairfax. All are highly left leaning imo. Why would one be different to the others? The coverage of Climate Change is the same in all three. VicLocal "If you had any credibility left Hutchy, it's now completely disappeared. You hassling and bullying Blowin over. Keep up the good work. Go the callous bastards! We can win this one. BB - " extra deaths. I believe there are no winners. I hope we can work out the best way to minimalize the loses. Time for you to check your numbers on another thread YOU callous bastard. You have really pissed me off today!!!!!!!!
Speaking from experience bb. Ha ha the best place to give advice from! No link, no credibility. But it doesn't for a number of reasons: 1. Try and make it less obvious. It would go against your poor character flaws. Thanks again though. What I say about BB must be true then.Example: We played in the The Things They Carried Critical Analysis Essay. Squealer is employed High School Interim Reflection alter the Seven Commandments to account for this humanisation, an allusion Illness In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein the Soviet government's revising of Daily Bleat Summary in order to exercise Daily Bleat Summary of the people's beliefs about themselves and their society. Unwind is the story The Things They Carried Critical Analysis Essay three teenagers who dulce et decorum est structure analysis been signed up for unwinding by parents or guardians.