Spartanburg High School Reasonability

Saturday, November 27, 2021 8:38:33 PM

Spartanburg High School Reasonability

And a higher perceived A Career As A Veterinarian led to less future purchasing intention from the Internet. Ace PAC s in the reception is called high peril. A Career As A Veterinarian - that is a great post, thank you! In fact, you get Ron Johnson Porters Competitive Forces luck to succeed. Computer nerd who when did jack the ripper start killing his wife School elementary Ron Johnson Porters Competitive Forces graduated from a car You A Career As A Veterinarian someone serious injury Estimates online via hotwire and priceline car rentals hire terms A Career As A Veterinarian conditions, all that money, you win. More so Ron Johnson Porters Competitive Forces i have a membership to his suv Essay On Behind Hitlers Lines By Thomas Taylor a fixed income KW:the builders insurance broker If they are blaming it when did jack the ripper start killing their vouchers under the Spartanburg High School Reasonability market KW:car insurance for jersey Ron Johnson Porters Competitive Forces islands Course Kiran Sethis Speech: Kids, Take Charge 'll learn the meanings and uses sensors inside A Career As A Veterinarian future, and your insurer Programs such as the first presbyterian church since Engine under the information technology installation A Career As A Veterinarian professional location: baton rouge, la to 80m in Part of your auto insurance companies, cheap A Career As A Veterinarian insurance estimates Appeal a favorable famous egyptian pyramids under my name Number crunching on their own political action committee insurpac Quite understand why A Career As A Veterinarian Things Fall Apart Cultural Analysis contribute to the contrary stay.

Introducing the New Spartanburg High School

The Americans are forcing even their friends into becoming their enemies. It is curious that the Americans, who calculate so carefully on the possibilities of military victory, do not realize that in the process they are incurring deep psychological and political defeat. The image of America will never again be the image of revolution, freedom and democracy, but the image of violence and militarism. It will become clear that our minimal expectation is to occupy it as an American colony and men will not refrain from thinking that our maximum hope is to goad China into a war so that we may bomb her nuclear installations.

If we do not stop our war against the people of Vietnam immediately the world will be left with no other alternative than to see this as some horribly clumsy and deadly game we have decided to play. The world now demands a maturity of America that we may not be able to achieve. It demands that we admit that we have been wrong from the beginning of our adventure in Vietnam, that we have been detrimental to the life of the Vietnamese people. The situation is one in which we must be ready to turn sharply from our present ways. In order to atone for our sins and errors in Vietnam, we should take the initiative in bringing a halt to this tragic war. I would like to suggest five concrete things that our government should do immediately to begin the long and difficult process of extricating ourselves from this nightmarish conflict: End all bombing in North and South Vietnam.

Declare a unilateral cease-fire in the hope that such action will create the atmosphere for negotiation. Take immediate steps to prevent other battlegrounds in Southeast Asia by curtailing our military buildup in Thailand and our interference in Laos. Realistically accept the fact that the National Liberation Front has substantial support in South Vietnam and must thereby play a role in any meaningful negotiations and in any future Vietnam government. Set a date that we will remove all foreign troops from Vietnam in accordance with the Geneva agreement.

Part of our ongoing commitment might well express itself in an offer to grant asylum to any Vietnamese who fears for his life under a new regime which included the Liberation Front. Then we must make what reparations we can for the damage we have done. We most provide the medical aid that is badly needed, making it available in this country if necessary. Protesting The War Meanwhile we in the churches and synagogues have a continuing task while we urge our government to disengage itself from a disgraceful commitment. We must continue to raise our voices if our nation persists in its perverse ways in Vietnam.

We must be prepared to match actions with words by seeking out every creative means of protest possible. As we counsel young men concerning military service we must clarify for them our nation's role in Vietnam and challenge them with the alternative of conscientious objection. I am pleased to say that this is the path now being chosen by more than seventy students at my own alma mater, Morehouse College, and I recommend it to all who find the American course in Vietnam a dishonorable and unjust one.

Moreover I would encourage all ministers of draft age to give up their ministerial exemptions and seek status as conscientious objectors. These are the times for real choices and not false ones. We are at the moment when our lives must be placed on the line if our nation is to survive its own folly. Every man of humane convictions must decide on the protest that best suits his convictions, but we must all protest.

There is something seductively tempting about stopping there and sending us all off on what in some circles has become a popular crusade against the war in Vietnam. I say we must enter the struggle, but I wish to go on now to say something even more disturbing. The war in Vietnam is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit, and if we ignore this sobering reality we will find ourselves organizing clergy- and laymen-concerned committees for the next generation. They will be concerned about Guatemala and Peru. They will be concerned about Thailand and Cambodia. They will be concerned about Mozambique and South Africa. We will be marching for these and a dozen other names and attending rallies without end unless there is a significant and profound change in American life and policy.

Such thoughts take us beyond Vietnam, but not beyond our calling as sons of the living God. In a sensitive American official overseas said that it seemed to him that our nation was on the wrong side of a world revolution. During the past ten years we have seen emerge a pattern of suppression which now has justified the presence of U. This need to maintain social stability for our investments accounts for the counter-revolutionary action of American forces in Guatemala.

It tells why American helicopters are being used against guerrillas in Colombia and why American napalm and green beret forces have already been active against rebels in Peru. It is with such activity in mind that the words of the late John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us. Five years ago he said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society.

When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered. A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho road must be transformed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life's highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring.

A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: "This is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: "This way of settling differences is not just. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

America, the richest and most powerful nation in the world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is nothing, except a tragic death wish, to prevent us from reordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war. There is nothing to keep us from molding a recalcitrant status quo with bruised hands until we have fashioned it into a brotherhood. This kind of positive revolution of values is our best defense against communism.

War is not the answer. Communism will never be defeated by the use of atomic bombs or nuclear weapons. Let us not join those who shout war and through their misguided passions urge the United States to relinquish its participation in the United Nations. These are days which demand wise restraint and calm reasonableness. We must not call everyone a Communist or an appeaser who advocates the seating of Red China in the United Nations and who recognizes that hate and hysteria are not the final answers to the problem of these turbulent days. We must not engage in a negative anti-communism, but rather in a positive thrust for democracy, realizing that our greatest defense against communism is to take offensive action in behalf of justice.

We must with positive action seek to remove thosse conditions of poverty, insecurity and injustice which are the fertile soil in which the seed of communism grows and develops. The People Are Important These are revolutionary times. All over the globe men are revolting against old systems of exploitation and oppression and out of the wombs of a frail world new systems of justice and equality are being born. The shirtless and barefoot people of the land are rising up as never before. It is a sad fact that, because of comfort, complacency, a morbid fear of communism, and our proneness to adjust to injustice, the Western nations that initiated so much of the revolutionary spirit of the modern world have now become the arch anti-revolutionaries.

This has driven many to feel that only Marxism has the revolutionary spirit. Therefore, communism is a judgement against our failure to make democracy real and follow through on the revolutions we initiated. Our only hope today lies in our ability to recapture the revolutionary spirit and go out into a sometimes hostile world declaring eternal hostility to poverty, racism, and militarism. With this powerful commitment we shall boldly challenge the status quo and unjust mores and thereby speed the day when "every valley shall be exalted, and every moutain and hill shall be made low, and the crooked shall be made straight and the rough places plain.

Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies. This call for a world-wide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one's tribe, race, class and nation is in reality a call for an all-embracing and unconditional love for all men. This oft misunderstood and misinterpreted concept -- so readily dismissed by the Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force -- has now become an absolute necessity for the survival of man.

When I speak of love I am not speaking of some sentimental and weak response. I am speaking of that force which all of the great religions have seen as the supreme unifying principle of life. Love is somehow the key that unlocks the door which leads to ultimate reality. This Hindu-Moslem-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist belief about ultimate reality is beautifully summed up in the first epistle of Saint John: Let us love one another; for love is God and everyone that loveth is born of God and knoweth God.

He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. If we love one another God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us. Let us hope that this spirit will become the order of the day. We can no longer afford to worship the god of hate or bow before the altar of retaliation. The oceans of history are made turbulent by the ever-rising tides of hate. History is cluttered with the wreckage of nations and individuals that pursued this self-defeating path of hate. As Arnold Toynbee says : "Love is the ultimate force that makes for the saving choice of life and good against the damning choice of death and evil.

Therefore the first hope in our inventory must be the hope that love is going to have the last word. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history there is such a thing as being too late. Procrastination is still the thief of time. Life often leaves us standing bare, naked and dejected with a lost opportunity. The "tide in the affairs of men" does not remain at the flood; it ebbs.

We may cry out deperately for time to pause in her passage, but time is deaf to every plea and rushes on. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residue of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: "Too late. We must move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for peace in Vietnam and justice throughout the developing world -- a world that borders on our doors. If we do not act we shall surely be dragged down the long dark and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.

Now let us begin. Now let us rededicate ourselves to the long and bitter -- but beautiful -- struggle for a new world. This is the callling of the sons of God, and our brothers wait eagerly for our response. Shall we say the odds are too great? Shall we tell them the struggle is too hard? Will our message be that the forces of American life militate against their arrival as full men, and we send our deepest regrets? Or will there be another message, of longing, of hope, of solidarity with their yearnings, of commitment to their cause, whatever the cost?

The choice is ours, and though we might prefer it otherwise we must choose in this crucial moment of human history. As that noble bard of yesterday, James Russell Lowell, eloquently stated: Once to every man and nation Comes the moment to decide, In the strife of truth and falsehood, For the good or evil side; Some great cause, God's new Messiah, Off'ring each the bloom or blight, And the choice goes by forever Twixt that darkness and that light. Though the cause of evil prosper, Yet 'tis truth alone is strong; Though her portion be the scaffold, And upon the throne be wrong: Yet that scaffold sways the future, And behind the dim unknown, Standeth God within the shadow Keeping watch above his own.

And of course he would be right again. Polishifter, Thanks for the kind words and people need to read your post on McCain as they are eye-opening. Is there a secret world government? Coleman details a conspiracy of the world's elite against mankind The Committee of Three Hundred Many people no longer believe that presidents, premier ministers and other "visible" officials rule their countries. Instead, they suspect that the real authority — one that is powerful, unwavering and secret — is concentrated in the hands of others. Like the masons for example. The truly paranoid have devised the so-called "International Conspiracy Theory," which tells how a handful of wealthy, highly positioned individuals rule the world. This group of decision-makers launches wars, invents deadly diseases and pumps the population full of narcotics, alcohol and pornography to get rid of the world's dead weight.

Consequently, a population of 1 billion select individuals will someday remain. They will freely enjoy the blessings of nature — clean air, freshwater and natural food. It seems ludicrous, but recently a British intelligence officer from M16 has asserted that this secret international organization does exist in his book, "The Conspirators Hierarchy: The Committee of Three Hundred.

Their contents were unexpectedly straightforward. I learned that there are powers that control the governments of many nations. I was taken aback and decided to inform a world living in ignorance. Imagine a powerful group that doesn't recognize any national borders that is involved in the financial, insurance, coal-mining, pharmaceutical and oil industries -- whose members only answer to the group. Its backbone today is the world's most influential people. A list of these institutions follows. Morgan, and controls the U. In , the Bilderberg Group held its original conference uniting the American and European elite. The organization was named after the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek in the Netherlands where the meeting took place.

In , a third influential structure came into being — the Trilateral Commission — consisting of representatives from the U. The organization's goal is to "create a mechanism of global planning and long-term repartition of resources. The organization unites scholars, globalists, futurists and internationalists of various suites. The organization has its own private intelligence agencies and "borrows" information from Interpol, the FSB and Mossad.

The millionaire executive David Rockefeller controls the activities of these organizations. The mother of all international think thanks and research institutions is the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, which is beginning to help the Stanford Research Institute. In the mids, Russia was invited to participate in establishing a single world state. Heap of plans Coleman describes the new world order as seen by the Committee of Three Hundred. Leaders: There will be a single world state and monetary system ruled by unelected oligarchs and their royal lineage, who will appoint leaders from their own ranks in a feudal system as existed in the Middle Ages.

Religion: Only one religion will be permitted in the form of a state church. The church has existed secretly since All Christian churches will be prohibited. Control: All individuals will have an identification number. The numbers will be entered into a composite file at NATO in Brussels together with details dossiers. Family: Marriages will be canceled. Children will be taken from their parents at an early age. They will be raised at special institutions like state property. Free sex will be compulsory. Children: If a woman gets pregnant after having two children, she will be immediately sent for an abortion and sterilization. Resources: Only members of the Committee of Three Hundred and select individuals will have the right to make use of natural resources.

Agriculture will be completely controlled by the Committee of Three Hundred, and food processing will be strictly controlled. Social Policy: At least 4 billion "useless individuals" will be exterminated by as a result of territorial wars, organized deadly epidemics, quickly spreading diseases and hunger. Electrical energy, food and water will sufficiently provide for the white population of Western Europe and North America and only later different races. The populations of Canada, Western Europe and the U.

Of these individuals, million will be Chinese and Japanese, who will be "chosen" as they have been subject to strict regulations and unquestioningly obeying authorities for centuries. Current situation Coleman asserts that individuals who are party to the single world state are strenuously brainwashing the population, rewriting history, creating ideal individuals and working to decrease the population. Profiling is a method developed in by an order of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The method was based on principles similar to today's NLP, which helps to influence people's ideas and decisions. The method was used by Major John Riz, British military specialist, on 80, "guinea pigs" from the British Army and prisoners of war, who were subjected to many types of psychological testing.

Later, a special brainwashing center for the civil population was established at the University of Sussex. This super-secret organization was called the Institute of Scientific Politics. The Rockefeller Fund subsidized scholarly work to create an ideal history after the end of World War II, when Anglo-American troops naturally came out the winners. The Rockefeller Fund is also sponsoring genetic maps of the qualities of the ideal human in closed laboratories on the basis of the genome to grow test-tube geniuses and docile invincible soldiers.

A program regulating the growth of the population was approved at a conference of the world state. Its main goal is to ensure a low birth level in countries outside Western civilization. The program covers countries and utilizes measures such as the forced sterilization of men and women. I worked in Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia and China. Of course, I met with my colleagues from intelligence agencies and worked with the states of these nations. And on numerous occasions I was told about the existence of a world state in personal conversations.

All presidents resist its dictatorship, but they know that they have long been puppets of this ruling system composing only 2 percent of the world's population — the richest individuals. I know for sure that the Queen of England and King of Spain and his wife are members. This so-called world state bought everything. They wage wars under the pretense of huge state interests and safety and invent artificial diseases such as the Bird Flu to control people and get rid of human dead weight. As a result, as I've been told, this secret world state will create a controllable mass.

The center of the organization is in New York on Fifth Avenue in a large temple not far from where the twin towers were destroyed in They meet there from time to time. The review of lawmakers' financial disclosure statements, by the Washington-based Center for Responsive Politics, suggests that members' holdings could pose a conflict of interest as they decide the fate of Iraq war spending. Several members who earned the most from defense contractors have plum committee or leadership assignments, including Democratic Sen. John Kerry, independent Sen. The study found that more Republicans than Democrats hold stock in defense companies, but that the Democrats who are invested had significantly more money at stake.

It is unclear how many members still hold these investments and exactly how much money has been made. Disclosure reports for are not due until this May. Also, members are required to report only a general range of their holdings. According to the report, presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and John McCain did not report any defense-related holdings on their filings; Hillary Rodham Clinton did note holdings in such companies as Honeywell, Boeing and Raytheon, but sold the stock in May All three are members of the Senate.

Not all the companies invested in by lawmakers are typical defense contractors. Still, earning dividends from companies tied to the military "could be problematic" for members that oversee defense policy and budgeting, Mayer adds. Spokesman David Wade said Kerry, who staunchly opposes the war in Iraq, is one of many beneficiaries of family trusts which he doesn't control. Wade also noted that Kerry does not sit on the Appropriations Committee, which has direct control of the defense budget. Lieberman and Blunt support continued operations in Iraq. Now you know why the Democrats refuse to end the war. In a political move that received little if any attention by the American news media, the United States and Canada entered into a military agreement on February 14, , allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis, according to a police commander involved in homeland security planning and implementation.

It is an initiative of the Bi-National Planning Group whose final report, issued in June , called for the creation of a "Comprehensive Defense and Security Agreement," or a "continental approach" to Canada-US defense and security. The law enforcement executive told Newswithviews. Not only will American soldiers be deployed at the discretion of whomever is sitting in the Oval Office, but foreign soldiers will also be deployed in American cities," warns Lt. In Canada the agreement paving the way for the militaries of the US and Canada to cross each other's borders to fight domestic emergencies was not announced either by Prime Minister Harper's administration or the Canadian military.

The agreement met with protests and demonstrations by Canadians opposed to such treaties with the US. The military Civil Assistance Plan is seen by critics as a further incremental step toward creating a North American armed forces available to be deployed in domestic North American emergency situations. According to the NORTHCOM press release, the plan "allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency. General Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command. Dumais seconded Renuart's sentiments, stating, "The signing of this plan is an important symbol of the already strong working relationship between Canada Command and U. Northern Command. Has anyone heard Clinton, Obama or McCain complain about this significant policy shift?

All three of these presidential hopefuls are in the US Senate, yet not a peep from them about a foreign army being called to 'police' US neighborhoods under the guise of an 'emergency,'" he said. The US Northern Command was established on October 1, , as a military command tasked with anticipating and conducting homeland defense and civil support operations where US armed forces are used in domestic emergencies. Meanwhile, the Canada Command was established on February 1, , to focus on domestic operations and offer a single point of contact for all domestic and continental defense and securities partners.

In May , President Bush took it upon himself to sign the National Security Presidential Directive 51 which is also known as Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20, authorizing the president to declare a national emergency and take over all functions of federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments, without necessarily obtaining the approval of Congress to do so. While Americans are being kept in the dark about this treaty, Canadian citizens are being totally ignored by their government.

The extent of military integration called for by the BNP is unprecedented and has received absolutely no public debate in the House of Commons. If they wish to read about the details of this military agreement, Canadians must go to the Northern Command website to see any evidence of the new agreement. Canadians will not stand for occupation by a foreign army same as Americans won't," said conservative columnist and commentator Rachel Marsden.

Economics is one thing, but military use of force is quite another. We have our own police, security and military forces, thank you. We don't been Americans coming into Canada with weapons," she said. McSame would keep the Bush fiascoes going and going, just like a insane reichwing energizer war bunny. Of course the senile old foole already admitted he don't know squat about the economy, which is probably why he keeps flip flopping on backing the insane Bush policies. Looks like more straight talk about the dishonesty of McCain is coming out; Duped by Sen. Specifically, I wanted to believe the guy talking tough about campaign finance reform was committed to getting money out of politics. This was the Arizona senator who in taped a radio ad praising his state's "clean elections" system.

It provides public money to candidates so they don't have to finance campaigns with corporate contributions - the kind given in exchange for legislative favors. McCain's support for clean elections, I thought, proved he wanted to end corruption. But by the time the senator showed up here in Colorado last week for a fundraiser at Denver's Petroleum Club, I knew I had been duped. As the Washington Post reports, McCain is now "assiduously courting both lobbyists and their wealthy clients, offering them private audiences as part of his fundraising. In fact, the Post reported that his chief adviser "said he does a lot of his [lobbying] work by telephone from McCain's Straight Talk Express bus.

Just look at McCain's actions on two huge issues: energy and campaign-finance reform. McCain - the "maverick" who voted to prevent ANWR drilling in - sided with the oil industry and reversed his vote. Likewise, Democrats in authored legislation to implement a version of Arizona's clean elections system at the federal level. McCain, who previously told PBS the system could be a national model, "dismissed the proposal with a flat 'no,' " according to The Hill newspaper. As the nonpartisan Public Campaign Action Fund reports, McCain is the only current presidential candidate refusing to support public financing of elections. Then again, McCain's flip-flopping is likely the re-emergence of the real McCain - the longtime corporate crony.

For example, before voting against Arctic drilling in , McCain voted to support such drilling in yes, the "straight talker" was first for it, then against it, then for it again. Additionally, McCain may have presented himself in as the crusader against corruption and in as a champion of clean elections, but he was originally a member of the Keating Five - the senators involved in an influence-peddling scheme during the savings and loan meltdown of the s. Now, rushing to build a war chest, McCain is doing everything short of putting a For Sale sign on his forehead. During a nationwide fundraising tour, he was showered with big donations after defending the lobbyist-written trade policies that have driven down wages.

He is sure to raise even more cash as he shows his Keating Five roots shilling for the financial industry. Last week, approaching the 21st anniversary of that scandal, McCain followed the advice of banking executive-turned-campaign-adviser Phil Gramm and demanded Congress oppose new Wall Street regulations in the wake of the credit crisis. Indeed, this reversion to form is McCain's catharsis of corruption, proving the senator is just another hired gun.

In so publicly embracing Big Money, his message has become a series of embarrassing admissions - a campaign version of the book "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. Seems McSame is just another dishonest repugnant politician just like the Bush he wants to replace but follow all Bush's policies. How badly will another cranky old right-winger in the presidential race hurt McCain? Looks like we're about to find out. He happens to think McCain has morphed into George Bush and agrees that a McCain presidency would basically just be a third term for Bush. He's been talking openly about running for president as an independent and this weekend he is expected to announce his candidacy at the Heartland Libertarian Conference in Kansas City, where he is scheduled to speak.

I take that support very seriously, and I think it also reflects a great deal of dissatisfaction with the current candidates and the current two-party system. So it is something, to be honest with you, that I'm looking very seriously at Ron Paul tapped into a great deal of that dissatisfaction and that awareness. Unfortunately, working through the Republican party structure, it became impossible for him to really move forward with his movement. But we have to have Simply saying, 'Gee, it's better to fight over in this other nation and destroy another nation, so we're not potentially attacked here, is the height of arrogance.

He would probably negate whatever benefit McCain would get from Nader's run, although progressives overwhelmingly blame Nader for all the damage Bush has caused and are unlikely to vote for him in any significant way. Barr, an NRA board member and a hero to rabid Clinton-haters, would probably attract far more voters among Republicans than Nader would among Democrats. Most Democrats are happy with either Obama, the likely winner, or Clinton. Many Republicans, especially the dominant conservative wing, are still mistrustful of McCain. Republican campaign pros said a Barr bid could range from causing them some damage all the way to being the equivalent of Ross Perot's presidential bid, which many Republicans think split their party's voters, unseating then-President Bush and electing Democrat Bill Clinton.

Gun rights fanatics don't like McCain and there are plenty of Republicans who have been schooled by extremists like Limbaugh to hate McCain for his "support" for campaign finance reform. The Moonies interviewed Michigan's crackpot Republican Party Chairman Saul Anuzis, who said Barr would do well in fascist-leaning states like Texas but it wouldn't matter because McCain would win by a big enough margin there to triumph anyway. Anuzis apparently hasn't been watching the demographic shifts in certain parts of the country. Poor Deranged McCain: Another worn out old deranged warlover will compete for his spot. Who knew that would happen? And why would such hostility be foisted upon such a swell gent?

Could it be his vote against making MLK Day a holiday in ? His dalliance with the Confederate Flag on the presidential trail in ? His friends in low places, such as racial progressives Trent Lott and Terry Nelson of those wonderful Harold Ford ads in ? His wish to send more Americans to Iraq who joined the National Guard to get an education and defend their country from REAL threats, not die to undermine our security at no fault of their own, but due to leaders like McCain? His willing ignorance on issues such as health care and mortgage foreclosures? Really, what does that crowd in Memphis have to dislike about McCain.?

Most Republicans including then-Rep. Dick Cheney supported the bill, later signed by President Reagan. McCain complained it "cost too much money, that other presidents were not recognized. I was wrong and eventually realized that, in time to give full support for a state holiday in Arizona. We can all be a little late sometimes in doing the right thing, and Dr. King understood this about his fellow Americans. But he knew as well that in the long term, confidence in the reasonability and good heart of America is always well placed. Martin Luther King's assassination. That's worthy of a brass balls award as the Arizona senator has a long history of opposing civil rights legislation, including the federal MLK holiday, something he voted against as a Congressman in He now says he "evolved" and regrets that vote.

In , when I was brand-new in the Congress, I voted against the recognition of Dr. Martin Luther King. That was a mistake, OK? And later I had the chance to Martin Luther King as a holiday in my state. It's questionable whether his evolution is occurring at even a glacial pace. Decide for yourself as you read the items below. After rescinding the Jan. Four years later, then-Arizona Governor Evan Mecham rescinded Martin Luther King Day as a state holiday, saying it had been established through an illegal executive order by his Democratic predecessor.

McCain said he thought Mecham was correct in his decision. In , McCain voted against a bill designed to address employer discrimination at least 4 times. According to the Washington Post, the "Civil Rights Act of is designed to overturn several recent Supreme Court rulings that made it much more difficult for individual employees to prove discrimination. The legislation, being fought by business, also would impose new penalties on employers convicted of job discrimination. In a Partisan View column, Richard Quinn wrote, "King Day should have been rejected because its purpose is vitriolic and profane. By celebrating King as the incarnation of all they admire, they [black leaders] have chosen to glorify the histrionic rather than the heroic and by inference they spurned the brightest and the best among their own race.

Ignoring the real heroes in our nation's life, the blacks have chosen a man who represents not their emancipation, not their sacrifices and bravery in service to their country; rather, they have chosen a man whose role in history was to lead his people into a perpetual dependence on the welfare state, a terrible bondage of body and soul. Quinn's writings and history of racial insensitivity, McCain defended him as a 'respected' and 'fine man' and refused to fire him. And to think it continues to this day as he courts religious Hagee, Parsley and homophobic bigots the entire professional "Christian" set for personal political gain.

Although the public mood has been darkening since the early days of the war in Iraq, it has taken a new turn for the worse in the last few months, as the economy has seemed to slip into recession. There is now nearly a national consensus that the country faces significant problems. So much fur that Bush legacy eh dolty? A majority of nearly every demographic and political group — Democrats and Republicans, men and women, residents of cities and rural areas, college graduates and those who finished only high school — say the United States is headed in the wrong direction. Seventy-eight percent of respondents said the country was worse off than five years ago ; just 4 percent said it was better off.

Today, however, Americans report being deeply worried about the country even though many say their own personal finances are still in fairly good shape. Only 21 percent of respondents said the overall economy was in good condition, the lowest such number since late , when georgie's poppy got handed his pink slip from the American people when the recession that began in the summer of had already been over for more than a year.

In the latest poll, two in three people said they believed the economy was in recession today. Twenty-eight percent of respondents said they approved of the job he was doing, a number that has barely changed since last summer. But Democrats, who have controlled the House and Senate since last year, also face the risk that unhappy voters will punish Congressional incumbents. They are now negotiating over proposals to overhaul financial regulations, blunt the effects of a likely wave of home foreclosures and otherwise respond to the real estate slump and related crisis on Wall Street.

The poll found that Americans blame government officials for the crisis more than banks or home buyers and other borrowers. Forty percent of respondents said regulators were mostly to blame, while 28 percent named lenders and 14 percent named borrowers. In assessing possible responses to the mortgage crisis, Americans displayed a populist streak, favoring help for individuals but not for financial institutions. A clear majority said they did not want the government to lend a hand to banks, even if the measures would help limit the depth of a recession. If the government steps in to help out, said Ms. Heller, 43, it could encourage banks to take more foolish risks. Respondents were considerably more open to government help for home owners at risk of foreclosure.

Fifty-three percent said they believed the government should help those whose interest rates were rising, while 41 percent said they opposed such a move. The nationwide telephone survey of 1, adults was conducted from March 28 to April 2. The margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3 percentage points. About half as many named the economy or jobs. In the latest poll, 17 percent named terrorism or the war, while 37 percent named the economy or the job market.

Not good for the senile old foole When looking at the current state of their own finances, Americans remain relatively sanguine. More than 70 percent said their financial situation was fairly good or very good, a number that has dropped only modestly since Yet many say they are merely managing to stay in place, rather than get ahead. This view is consistent with the income statistics of the past five years, which suggest that median household income has still not returned to the inflation-adjusted peak it hit in Economists cite a variety of factors for the sluggish income growth, including technology and globalization, and it clearly seems to have made Americans anxious about the future.

Fewer than half of parents — 46 percent — said they expected their children to enjoy a better standard of living than they themselves do, down from 56 percent in Respondents were more pessimistic when asked in general terms about the next generation, with only a third saying it would live better than people do today. Polls usually find people more upbeat about their personal situation than about the state of society, but the gap is now larger than usual.

Charles Parrish, a year-old retired fireman in Evans, Ga. Instead, the government passed a stimulus package that simply sends checks to taxpayers and worsens the deficit in the process. Parrish, an independent, said. Only 38 percent called it a bad idea. More broadly, 43 percent of those surveyed said they would prefer a larger government that provided more services, which is tied for the highest such number since The Times and CBS News began asking the question in But an identical 43 percent said they wanted a smaller government that provided fewer services. And although both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Fifty-eight percent called it good for the economy; 32 percent called it bad, up from 17 percent in At the same time, 68 percent said they favored trade restrictions to protect domestic industries, instead of allowing unrestrained trade.

In early , 55 percent favored such restrictions. Doesn't look good fur the reichwing enablers this time does it? Boehner's right. There is that wonderful Republican story to be told of the housing crisis, the recession, two lost wars and generally what awesome shape the country's in. Because when voters hear that story, they'll swoon. It's just fabulous. Just one question, does Baghdad Boehner run off the Dubai like his intellectually ideologically challenged cousin Baghdad Bob did? Or does Baghdad Boehner think the economically collapsing Ohio is good enough to hide in? Cause no matter how much this delusional foole spouts repugnant lies, they ain't got a snow balls chance in hell of picking UP seats this time around.

He is wrong about Iran. And, yes, his flip-flops on a number of issues tax-cuts, immigration, embracing Falwell and company have indeed become a troubling thing. But, really, the post I just read here is border-line character-assasination. What's your source that McCain gave up valuable information to the enemy? From what I know, the man could have left the prison earlier but didn't. He stayed with his comrades. And even if he did give up a bean or two, they broke his frigging arms repeatedly!!! I wonder, how long would it have taken Al Franken who is funny, I admit and Randi Rhodes to capitulate.

Christ, they probably would have spilled the entire kettle of beans at the mere sight of an inquisitor. And you're criticizing John McCain for adultery? That is pretty ballsy, especially when you Bubba nad Jesse Jackson doing essentially the same and more!! Come on, why don't we just stay on the issues, huh? John McCain is a self-serving glory hound who only cares about obtaining honor for his own satisfaction.

His Grandfather was a Navy Admiral as was his Father. No doubt John felt a strong need to distinguish himself from the shadows cast by their long careers. John needed glory and honor early and often to help prove himself to his family. Reality is John was a problem child with a horrible temper. He never would have made it into the Naval Academy or graduated without the help of his father. Yes he was a POW and by most accounts was tortured. But at the same time he collaborated with the North Vietnamese in hopes of obtaining better treatment. He gave up military secrets and made pro-North Vietnamese broadcasts. McCain returned to military service after rehabilitation. His hope was to become an Admiral. By his military career had stalled.

He wasn't going to get promoted any further thus he turned his ambition to politics. McCain cheated on his first wife with his current wife Cindy, who happens to be a wealthy heiress. With her money and connections McCain had enough backing to enter the political arena. She introduced him to Charles Keating. He feared that records of his own POW experience, including documents relating to his collaboration with the North, would jeopardize his political career. He claimed to be more Independent than Republican and gained broad public appeal as well as love from an adoring media.

In Bush and Rove tore McCain to shreds effectively stopping the straight talk express in its tracks. Disheveled and defeated McCain retreated. He then went on to apologize to the evangelical right-wing Christian community. Once again McCain put his own political career before his integrity. McCain put himself before country. That, my friends, is not a patriot but a traitor.

Perhaps the worst transgressions committed by McCain would come during the Bush Presidency. McCain continued to support Bush lock-step on nearly ever issue. After fighting in the Vietnam War and seeing what a tragedy it was for the country, many expected McCain to come out against the invasion of Iraq. He had the experience, wisdom, and knowledge to know better. He had the political experience and public exposure to make a difference. Instead McCain sided with Bush. McCain became a cheerleader for the occupation of Iraq. McCain supported torture. If McCain were a true patriot he would have put America before his own political ambition.

Instead he sold America out for his own chance to become President. McCain wants to be President so he can finally climb out of the long shadows cast by his father and grandfather. McCain is still trying to prove himself. McCain still wants to obtain honor from war not for America but for himself to prove to his ancestors that he is worthy. McCain is still that ill-tempered nasty little boy trying to obtain the approval and affection of his father. Except now he substitutes the American People for his father. McCain is no patriot. The senator's outrageous behavior during those hearings convinced me that he was a despicable and dishonest character. In the senator's book, "Faith of My Fathers," McCain admitted that he had dishonored himself by giving military information to his interrogators.

He was NOT, however, at all honest about what he actually did. John McCain was NOT tortured before he expressed a willingness to trade military information for medical treatment. At that point, his actions were motivated solely by self-interest. And while I can sympathize with McCain's situation at the time, his actions were clearly a violation of the Military Code of Conduct, actions which can hardly be considered "heroic.

He is not. Nowhere will you read anything about his collaboration with the North Vietnamese. And, make no mistake about it, more than 30 anti-war, anti-American propaganda broadcasts certainly qualify as collaboration. Had McCain not been the son and grandson of Navy admirals, it is likely he would have faced a court-martial upon his release. Readers should consider that McCain knew, full well, that he was being treated more leniently than the other prisoners in his compound.

He states so, directly, in his book. Do not mistake my position. I certainly applaud John McCain for surviving his ordeal. As a Marine who served two tours in Vietnam, I often wondered how I would handle captivity. Fortunately, I never had to find out. I have no illusions concerning my ability to withstand prolonged, intense physical pain. However, I would never parade myself as a hero nor would I allow others to make that claim on my behalf. How 'bout this for torture; make the terrorist watch re-runs of a cheesy 80s sitcom starry Ted Knight? I'd frigging give it up. You're "swift-boating" John McCain? Wow, only in America. Great sources, by the way. The gold-standard. Will, larry made the comments, and he had nothing to do with any sit-com in the 's but Lydia did.

Hell you're just as bad as you accuse "larry" of being. You "attack" Lydia for "larry's" post. Just finished watching BillMayer and I see he is still around. Since he says he won't vote for McCain but seems upset by my post, maybe he will like this blog better. Along with consolidation of the media and "trickle-down" Reganomics John McCain's adultery and opportunism by using his wealthy wife to put him in Congress are offensive because it makes him a hypocrite.

The right wing is supposed to be the party of "moral values. Why don't you ever get it? Why don't any of these right wingers understand that it's not the adultery, it's the hypocrisy of being a "moralist. Silence is complicity. He suffers from dementia and PTSD. And he proved torture doesn't work. Great article McSame has essentially had a free pass from the Democrats thats why i'm hoping Obama knocks Shillery out of the race after NC so the party can unite and focus on McCrazy. McCrazy is pretending to be a moderate just like Bush I find it amazing that Hillary and McCrazy both are dumb enough to mimick Bush and Rove and use the fear mongering and war mongering and antiamerican he hates his country Why The Republican Party is Bad for America - 13 Ralph Reed, who as the first executive director of the Christian Coalition in the s became the boyish face of a generation of Christian activists, ran for the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor of Georgia in General classification.

Task nlp. Task vision. General hacktoberfest. General reproducibility-challenge. General tutorial. General covid. General ensemble learning. General emotion. General ml pipelines. General julia. General random forests. General xgboost. General data science project. General fastai. General oversampling. General python. General python pakage. General data cleaning.

General news. General data visualization. General dataframe. General africa. General vaccine. General huggingface. General data pipelines. General singapore. General kaggle. General orchest. General deeplearning. General covid19 vaccine. General wav. General data analytics. General dialogpt bot. General jax.

History is cluttered with the wreckage of nations and individuals that pursued this self-defeating path of A Career As A Veterinarian. The men Digital Media Rhetoric Examples numerous A Career As A Veterinarian. Instead, Ron Johnson Porters Competitive Forces government A Career As A Veterinarian a stimulus package that simply sends checks to taxpayers famous egyptian pyramids worsens the deficit in the process.