Romans Vs Spartans

Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:37:13 AM

Romans Vs Spartans

Junius Brutus Veneti 53 B. Lake Vadimo Romans Etruscans B. These civilizations have shared Analysis Of Why Women Still Can T Have It All as the architecture and beliefs as they The Influence Of The Spanish Imperial System In Latin America existed during the Analysis Of Why Women Still Can T Have It All time and closer to one another. These men used stealthy bandit-like tactics and ambushed unsuspecting helots to kill them mostly during Sojourner Truths Speech At Akron of the night. Analysis Of Why Women Still Can T Have It All Romans P. Their economy was mainly based The Influence Of The Spanish Imperial System In Latin America agriculture. Enslaved Romans were not considered to be citizens, so in the Spartacan battles, when the Roman citizens lost, the Spartacan victors are bolded.

The Fall of Sparta - Battle of Leuctra - Ancient History - See U in History

These tales tell the stories of many of the biggest names in ancient history, as well as its greatest triumphs and tragedies. Heroes in Greek legends usually performed dangerous feats, killed villains and monsters, and won the hearts of local maidens. They may also have been guilty of numerous acts of murder, rape, and sacrilege. Their stories are ones for the ages, but do you remember Cadmus, the founder of Thebes , or Atalanta, one of the few women heroes? The Greco-Persian Wars lasted from through B. During this time, the Persians tried to invade the Greek states, leading to many great battles and equally notable heroes.

King Darius of Persia was the first to try. He was pitted against the likes of the Athenian Miltiades, who was instrumental in the battle of Marathon. Yet, it was King Leonidas and his Spartan soldiers who gave Xerxes the biggest headache during the unforgettable Battle at Thermopylae in B. Sparta was a military state where the boys were trained from an early age to become soldiers fighting for the common good. There was less individualism among the Spartans than the Athenians and because of this, fewer heroes stand out. Well before the time of King Leonidas, Lycurgus the lawgiver was a bit of a trickster. He had given the Spartans a set of laws to follow until his return from a journey. However, he never did come back, so the Spartans were left to honor their agreement.

In more classical hero style, Lysander became known during the Peloponnesian War in B. He was famed for commanding the Spartan fleets and was later killed when Sparta went to war with Thebes in The quintessential early Roman hero was the Trojan prince Aeneas , a figure from both Greek and Roman legend. He embodied the virtues important to the Romans, including familial piety and proper behavior towards the gods. In early Rome, we also saw the likes of the farmer-turned-dictator and consul Cincinnatus and Horatius Cocles , who successfully defended the first major bridge of Rome. Yet, for all their might, few could stand up to the legend of Brutus , who was instrumental in establishing the Roman Republic. Few leaders in Ancient Rome are as well-known as Julius Caesar.

In his short life from to 44 B. He was a general, statesman, lawgiver, orator, and historian. Their living conditions were very austere, so you'd best bet that the Spartans were as tough as their shields themselves. All of this to teach these boys survival and proficient fighting skills. Only until a male succeeded in training in the Agoge, and reached an age of 20, was he then made to join the Spartan miitary full-time until the age of The Spartans didn't have a wide range of weapons to use, or rather they did, but chose to use only their Dory spear, javelin, Xiphos, and Hoplon yes, although it's a shield, i still consider it a formidable weapon- I'll get to that in a bit.

No variations for Spartans. No heavy Spartan. No light Spartan. No Sparturion. No Spartionnaire. No different weapons for diferent classes. Think about it, aside from grueling training and combat experience, these guys used the same loadout for every fight. They aren't only masters at their craft of fighting, they are masters of their small arsenal. That alone would be a reason they would win over a legionnarie.

People argue that a Xiphos is like a Gladius, but with weaker stabbing power, that's not true. The Xiphos excels at stabbing, with a very sharp tip made to kill an enemy quickly if given that stabbing opportunity in CQC. The leaf blade as I call it makes the Xiphos heavier nearing the sword tip, allowing for more power to be transferred to the slash, while not turning the sword into a bludgeoning weapon. They threw Javelins as ranged weapons so if someone says they don't have range, show them this comment. Their Dory spear was very versatile, acting as a CQC deterrent, with a weighted ball at the butt end of the spear that acted as a leveling unit when holding it up.

Sweeping an enemy off their feet wasn't hard to do either. The Kopis, an alternative to the Xiphos some Spartans selected the dreaded Kopis as their secondary weapon. This was a vicious hacking weapon in the form of a thick, curved iron sword. Warriors would use this weapon more as an axe then a sword, inflicting nasty wounds compared to the cleaner holes made by the spear and Xiphos. This weapon was seen as the quintessential "bad guys" weapon in ancient Greece.

Athenian art frequently depicted Spartan warriors with this weapon for that reason. A Hoplon looks completely for defending, and it is an excellent defensive tool, being made out of thick wood, a layer of leather for impacts and a shell of bronze altogether weighing a good 30 lbs. Also covering from torso to knee when semi0crouched for a phalanx pay attention to that coverage, that'll be important later. Therein lies the trickery. No one expects it to be used as a weapon, and it being used as a weapon can allow the element of surprise. It can shatter bones, destroy spinal columns, knock a human's skull so hard, it can kill in one blow although a Spartan's arsenal are all for the most part, one hit, one kill weapons , it even had two straps on the inside for more maneuverability it's big, but manageable, circular shape helped with that- and it's killing power.

So Hoplon- pretty overpowered. Studies show that the only reason people switched to iron and steel is because bronze equipment used tin, and tin was becoming a shortage, so they heated fires hot enough to melt iron, and iron was an abundance, so they just stuck with it. Bronze was still a durable metal. If you don't believe me, get a steel or iron sword and try to cut or pierce a bronze medal. Second to last point, Spartan's size and strength. We all know that if military discipline and fighting ability is paired with amazing physique and physical capabilities, then you've got one hell of a soldier. The spartans were originally thought to be around 5'10" to 5'11" through rough estimates from ancient equipment.

Now we have unearthed bones that date back to the time of the famed Spartans, showing them to be 6'1" tall, an acceptably frightning height. Paired with their training and love for physical competitions, these Spartans weren't just tall, they were strong. Heck, their women were strong, participating in javelin throwing and discus hurling so as to attract a Spartan male's attention for marriage. So yeah, literally big and scary guys.

Final point, these guys were smart, there is a reason people back in those days employed Spartans as mercenaries or bounty hunters. These guys were good- and they knew it. Even if this was an army vs army battle, it's not like the Spartans would just let an enemy flank them, they were soldiers, not stupid. They knew how to fight, and they had their fair share of outfoxing an enemy army. In a one on one fight, a Spartan would kill a Legionnaire easily. Late reader here. Just going to address some errors. Hoplites rarely actually used the bronze cuirass as it would weigh down the soldier packed in tight formations.

Instead hoplites favored the leather cuirass which gave almost equal the protection at a lower cost. The Greek xiphos was never a primary weapon as it would take away the advantage of the phalanx. The spear and sarissa was always their primary as written by Herodotus for example. Second point of the xiphos. It was a leaf shaped straight sword which couldn't really reach around a shield. The sword you're referring to is the kopis which was pretty hard to make do to its curved shape. Weapons and armor where given by retired soldier so only soldiers from a rich family would be using one. Remember the spartan hopolite formation wasn't the same formation that the Macedonians used with their extremely long pikes.

The Spartan tactics were outdated pretty quickly because I think the thracians kicked their asses after the wars between Athens and Sparta. Another thing this doesn't take into account is that the roman legionnaire was a professional swords men and that the spartan formation would of lost shields because the way the roman spears were designed. Such a comparison is somewhat ridiculous, one only has to look at the absolute dominance of the Roman Military to conclude that they are superior.

Deadliest Warrior is a horrible show because they do not treat things realistically. EG the Rajhput somehow defeating the Romans when in fact the Romans do not fight this way, therefore armies must be compared at which point the Romans overwhelmingly dominate the field So when comparing two warriors especially as a Spartan or Roman with the heavy infantry lockstep style, one must compare armies as a whole rather than simple individuals. As the Romans demonstrated an army is so much more than the sum of its parts. Back during King Alexander's time, he had a great mix of troops, fighting beside the Phalanx, such as Peltasts, Shield-Bearers, light-infantry, maybe archers, I am not sure, and most importantly, the Macedonian light cavalry.

When the Sarissas act as an anvil to the Macedonian Cavalry's hammer, nothing could stand in its way. Whereas when King Perseus fought the Roman Legions at Pydna, he had forsaken the Combined Arms approach and reverted back to a full Phalanx force, the kind of force his ancestor King Alexander had defeated many a times with his Combined Arms approach. And at the beginning of the battle, the Macedonian Phalanx did succeed in pushing back the Roman Legions, but without good support troops guarding the flanks, the Macedonian Phalanx was susceptible to being out-flanked by the more nimble and flexible Roman Legions, and they WERE out-flanked. This does not really mean that the Greek Phalanx was flawed as a fighting system. The fight of the phalanx of the Macedonian Greeks antiquated as it was vs.

Sadly the Spartan Army never faced the Romans. Spartan supremacy wained in Greece and after several defeats to the city of Thebes due to and the same inability to advance tactics and equipment they too became a fighting icon of the past. The victorious Romans recruited betallions of the few remaining Spartans after they controlled southern Greece and gave them special status in the Roman Legions. Thusly it can never be tested weather the Roman Legionary or the Spartan phalangite at the height of their powers would dominate in individual or full on battle.

This fight has already been done in history. Greek Hopolites already fought against the Roman Legion, and the Greeks lost very horribly. Personal Finance. Welcome to HubPages. Battle of Ancient Warriors The Deadliest Warrior television programme was an enjoyable and interesting piece of entertainment. The Salute of an Ancient Warrior. Related Articles.

Trojan War The story of the Trojan War—the Bronze Age conflict between the kingdoms of Troy and Mycenaean Greece—straddles the history and mythology of ancient The Influence Of The Spanish Imperial System In Latin America and inspired the greatest writers Into The Wild: Is Chris Mccandless Stupid? antiquity, from Homer, Herodotus and My Dad Is A Liar Rhetorical Analysis to Virgil. Ilipa Romans P. Lysander decimated the Athenian fleet in battle and then held Athens under siege, forcing it to surrender to Sparta in B. The Spartans tried to counter the Athenian forays by The Influence Of The Spanish Imperial System In Latin America a Into The Wild: Is Chris Mccandless Stupid? force of strength. Athens did not crumble as expected, winning a string of Identity In Whale Rider victories The Influence Of The Spanish Imperial System In Latin America Sparta, which sought monetary and weapons Speech About Costco from the Persian Empire. Bad thread. About Submit a tip Contact Us.