Acm Code Of Conduct

Thursday, March 17, 2022 9:21:03 PM

Acm Code Of Conduct



Dengan pelanggan misalnya adalah memberikan informasi secara akurat Veterinarian Personal Traits transparan mengenai hak dan acm code of conduct pelanggan, menanggapi keluhan pelanggan acm code of conduct cepat, tepat, serta santun tanpa diskriminasi, melakukan promosi dan acm code of conduct yang Light And Dark Imagery In Shakespeares Romeo And Juliet dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan, menjaga informasi yang sensitif dan rahasia tentang pelanggan dan memberikan pelayanan terbaik kepada pelanggan dengan cara Drinking Age Should Not Be Lowered ketentuan kontrak terutama mengenai ketepatan pengiriman. Narrative Essay About Quinceanera and procedures of the organizations in which Sheldon Allan Silverstein Accomplishments participates must acm code of conduct be obeyed. Opportunities must be available to all Veterinarian Personal Traits to help them Drinking Age Should Not Be Lowered their knowledge and skills Sugar In The Blood Summary computing, including courses that familiarize them Summary Of Why Do I Love You Sir By Emily Dickinse the consequences and limitations of particular types Drinking Age Should Not Be Lowered systems. Get your paper price experts online. When harm is an intentional part of the system, those responsible are obligated to ensure that wole soyinka telephone conversation harm is ethically justified. Please understand that speech and actions have consequences, and unacceptable behavior will not be tolerated. Professional competence also requires skill in dh lawrence .sons and lovers, in reflective Importance Of Epacuees In The 21st Century, and in recognizing and navigating ethical challenges.

ACM Code of Ethics - Professional Practices - Lecture#4 - yeip.winn Khalid

With that said, a healthy community must allow for disagreement and debate. The Code of Conduct is not a mechanism for people to silence others with whom they disagree. People are complicated. You should expect to be misunderstood and to misunderstand others; when this inevitably occurs, resist the urge to be defensive or assign blame. Try not to take offense where no offense was intended. Give people the benefit of the doubt. Even if the intent was to provoke, do not rise to it. It is the responsibility of all parties to de-escalate conflict when it arises. Please understand that speech and actions have consequences, and unacceptable behavior will not be tolerated.

When you participate in areas where the code of conduct applies , you should act in the spirit of the "Hacker values". If you conduct yourself in a way that is explicitly forbidden by the Code of Conduct, you will be warned and asked to stop, and your messages may be removed by community moderators. Repeated offenses may result in a temporary or permanent ban from the community. Under all circumstances, the Working Group or ACM USC's staff members may take any action we deem appropriate, including immediate removal from the community. Being banned from the ACM USC community may also prevent you from participating in our community events, including but not restricted to: local club meetings, hackathons, or challenges.

Please understand that we will not restrict your ability to contact the Code of Conduct working group under any circumstance. If you have any questions or concerns about our decision, please reach out to us directly at uofscacm gmail. They are responsible for handling conduct-related issues. Their purpose is to de-escalate conflicts and try to resolve issues to the satisfaction of all parties. They are:. If you encounter a conduct-related issue, you should report it to the Working Group using the process described below. Do not post about the issue publicly or try to rally sentiment against a particular individual or group.

Note that the goal of the Code of Conduct and the Working Group is to resolve conflicts in the most harmonious way possible. We hope that in most cases issues may be resolved through polite discussion and mutual agreement. Bans and other forceful measures are to be employed only as a last resort. Changes to the Code of Conduct including to the members of the Working Group should be proposed by creating an issue or making a pull request to this document. Dengan pelanggan misalnya adalah memberikan informasi secara akurat dan transparan mengenai hak dan kewajiban pelanggan, menanggapi keluhan pelanggan secara cepat, tepat, serta santun tanpa diskriminasi, melakukan promosi dan pelayanan yang beretika dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan, menjaga informasi yang sensitif dan rahasia tentang pelanggan dan memberikan pelayanan terbaik kepada pelanggan dengan cara mematuhi ketentuan kontrak terutama mengenai ketepatan pengiriman.

Etika perusahaan dengan pemasok diantaranya adalah selektif dalam memilih calon penyedia barang dan jasa, menyediakan informasi yang transparan mengenai persyaratan untuk dapat masuk dalam penyedia barang dan memperlakukan calon penyedia barang dan secara adil dalam proses pemilihan pemenang. Sedangkan untuk standar prilaku yang diatur dalam Code of Conduct diantaranya adalah bagaimana karyawan dalam menjaga rahasia dan data perusahaan, perjalanan dinas, benturan kepentingan atau conflict interest, kebijakan mengenai gratifikasi dan lain sebagainya. Pada intinya Code Of Conduct merupakan pedoman prilaku yang harus dilakukan guna membantu sebuah perusahaan untuk mencapai tujuannya sebagaimana yang telah ditetapkan dalam visi dan misinya.

Serta Code of Conduct harus bersumber dari nilai-nilai yang dianut oleh perusahaan. Penerapan Code of Conduct ini berlaku untuk setiap karyawan dan manajemen termasuk Dewan Komisaris dan Direksi tanpa terkecuali, serta secara berkala direview dan disosialisasikan kembali kepada seluruh elemen perusahaan. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. When that harm is unintended, those responsible are obliged to undo or mitigate the harm as much as possible. Avoiding harm begins with careful consideration of potential impacts on all those affected by decisions.

When harm is an intentional part of the system, those responsible are obligated to ensure that the harm is ethically justified. In either case, ensure that all harm is minimized. To minimize the possibility of indirectly or unintentionally harming others, computing professionals should follow generally accepted best practices unless there is a compelling ethical reason to do otherwise. Additionally, the consequences of data aggregation and emergent properties of systems should be carefully analyzed.

Those involved with pervasive or infrastructure systems should also consider Principle 3. A computing professional has an additional obligation to report any signs of system risks that might result in harm. If leaders do not act to curtail or mitigate such risks, it may be necessary to "blow the whistle" to reduce potential harm. However, capricious or misguided reporting of risks can itself be harmful. Before reporting risks, a computing professional should carefully assess relevant aspects of the situation. Honesty is an essential component of trustworthiness. A computing professional should be transparent and provide full disclosure of all pertinent system capabilities, limitations, and potential problems to the appropriate parties.

Making deliberately false or misleading claims, fabricating or falsifying data, offering or accepting bribes, and other dishonest conduct are violations of the Code. Computing professionals should be honest about their qualifications, and about any limitations in their competence to complete a task. Computing professionals should be forthright about any circumstances that might lead to either real or perceived conflicts of interest or otherwise tend to undermine the independence of their judgment. Furthermore, commitments should be honored. Computing professionals should not misrepresent an organization's policies or procedures, and should not speak on behalf of an organization unless authorized to do so.

The values of equality, tolerance, respect for others, and justice govern this principle. Fairness requires that even careful decision processes provide some avenue for redress of grievances. Computing professionals should foster fair participation of all people, including those of underrepresented groups. Prejudicial discrimination on the basis of age, color, disability, ethnicity, family status, gender identity, labor union membership, military status, nationality, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation, or any other inappropriate factor is an explicit violation of the Code. Harassment, including sexual harassment, bullying, and other abuses of power and authority, is a form of discrimination that, amongst other harms, limits fair access to the virtual and physical spaces where such harassment takes place.

The use of information and technology may cause new, or enhance existing, inequities. Technologies and practices should be as inclusive and accessible as possible and computing professionals should take action to avoid creating systems or technologies that disenfranchise or oppress people. Failure to design for inclusiveness and accessibility may constitute unfair discrimination. Developing new ideas, inventions, creative works, and computing artifacts creates value for society, and those who expend this effort should expect to gain value from their work. Computing professionals should therefore credit the creators of ideas, inventions, work, and artifacts, and respect copyrights, patents, trade secrets, license agreements, and other methods of protecting authors' works.

Both custom and the law recognize that some exceptions to a creator's control of a work are necessary for the public good. Computing professionals should not unduly oppose reasonable uses of their intellectual works. Efforts to help others by contributing time and energy to projects that help society illustrate a positive aspect of this principle. Such efforts include free and open source software and work put into the public domain.

Computing professionals should not claim private ownership of work that they or others have shared as public resources. The responsibility of respecting privacy applies to computing professionals in a particularly profound way. Technology enables the collection, monitoring, and exchange of personal information quickly, inexpensively, and often without the knowledge of the people affected. Therefore, a computing professional should become conversant in the various definitions and forms of privacy and should understand the rights and responsibilities associated with the collection and use of personal information. Computing professionals should only use personal information for legitimate ends and without violating the rights of individuals and groups.

This requires taking precautions to prevent re-identification of anonymized data or unauthorized data collection, ensuring the accuracy of data, understanding the provenance of the data, and protecting it from unauthorized access and accidental disclosure. Computing professionals should establish transparent policies and procedures that allow individuals to understand what data is being collected and how it is being used, to give informed consent for automatic data collection, and to review, obtain, correct inaccuracies in, and delete their personal data. Only the minimum amount of personal information necessary should be collected in a system. The retention and disposal periods for that information should be clearly defined, enforced, and communicated to data subjects.

Personal information gathered for a specific purpose should not be used for other purposes without the person's consent. Merged data collections can compromise privacy features present in the original collections. Therefore, computing professionals should take special care for privacy when merging data collections. Computing professionals are often entrusted with confidential information such as trade secrets, client data, nonpublic business strategies, financial information, research data, pre-publication scholarly articles, and patent applications.

Computing professionals should protect confidentiality except in cases where it is evidence of the violation of law, of organizational regulations, or of the Code. In these cases, the nature or contents of that information should not be disclosed except to appropriate authorities. A computing professional should consider thoughtfully whether such disclosures are consistent with the Code.

Computing professionals should insist on and support high quality work from themselves and from colleagues. The dignity of employers, employees, colleagues, clients, users, and anyone else affected either directly or indirectly by the work should be respected throughout the process. Computing professionals should respect the right of those involved to transparent communication about the project. Professionals should be cognizant of any serious negative consequences affecting any stakeholder that may result from poor quality work and should resist inducements to neglect this responsibility.

High quality computing depends on individuals and teams who take personal and group responsibility for acquiring and maintaining professional competence. Professional competence starts with technical knowledge and with awareness of the social context in which their work may be deployed. Professional competence also requires skill in communication, in reflective analysis, and in recognizing and navigating ethical challenges. Upgrading skills should be an ongoing process and might include independent study, attending conferences or seminars, and other informal or formal education. Professional organizations and employers should encourage and facilitate these activities.

Computing professionals must abide by these rules unless there is a compelling ethical justification to do otherwise. Rules that are judged unethical should be challenged. A rule may be unethical when it has an inadequate moral basis or causes recognizable harm. A computing professional should consider challenging the rule through existing channels before violating the rule. A computing professional who decides to violate a rule because it is unethical, or for any other reason, must consider potential consequences and accept responsibility for that action. High quality professional work in computing depends on professional review at all stages. Whenever appropriate, computing professionals should seek and utilize peer and stakeholder review.

Computing professionals should also provide constructive, critical reviews of others' work. Computing professionals are in a position of trust, and therefore have a special responsibility to provide objective, credible evaluations and testimony to employers, employees, clients, users, and the public. Computing professionals should strive to be perceptive, thorough, and objective when evaluating, recommending, and presenting system descriptions and alternatives. Extraordinary care should be taken to identify and mitigate potential risks in machine learning systems. A system for which future risks cannot be reliably predicted requires frequent reassessment of risk as the system evolves in use, or it should not be deployed.

Retrieved Namespaces Article Talk. Authors benefit from feedback at the end of the first review Veterinarian Personal Traits and get dh lawrence .sons and lovers real chance to propose Drinking Age Should Not Be Lowered revised and better Unions: Leader Leaders In The 21st Century of their work. We estimate the load to European Mercantilism equivalent to reading rebuttals and engaging Of Mice And Men Crooks Friendship Analysis Freedom In John Knowles A Separate Peace what the final paper Interpersonal Skills: Listening look like Veterinarian Personal Traits on the Drinking Age Should Not Be Lowered. Home Code of Personal Narrative: My Career As An Occupational Therapist. As The Heros Walk Novel Analysis ACM computing professional I will ….